UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

UBIL-U.TO (Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD) and ZUCM.TO (BMO USD Cash Management ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBIL-U.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Global X, while ZUCM.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by BMO. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, UBIL-U.TO returned 3.87% vs 4.23% for ZUCM.TO. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. UBIL-U.TO charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for ZUCM.TO.

Performance

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) and BMO USD Cash Management ETF (ZUCM.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

UBIL-U.TO is traded in USD, while ZUCM.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the ZUCM.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBIL-U.TO achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than ZUCM.TO's 1.83% return.

UBIL-U.TO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.62%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 3.87%
• 3Y*: 5.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZUCM.TO

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 1.83%
• 6M: 2.50%
• 1Y: 4.23%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
UBIL-U.TO Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD	1.62%	4.21%	5.49%	1.81%
ZUCM.TO BMO USD Cash Management ETF	1.83%	4.15%	5.46%	1.19%

Correlation

The correlation between UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023	-0.03

Return for Risk

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBIL-U.TO

UBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100
UBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
UBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
UBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
UBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
UBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100

ZUCM.TO

ZUCM.TO Risk / Return Rank: 49
ZUCM.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
ZUCM.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ZUCM.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
ZUCM.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ZUCM.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) and BMO USD Cash Management ETF (ZUCM.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBIL-U.TO	ZUCM.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	12.54	0.74	+11.80
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	38.08	1.12	+36.96
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	10.05	1.13	+8.92
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	97.10	3.14	+93.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	571.97	9.52	+562.45

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 12.54, which is higher than the ZUCM.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBIL-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.08%, smaller than the maximum ZUCM.TO drawdown of -1.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBIL-U.TO	ZUCM.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.08%	-1.89%	+1.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.04%	-1.35%	+1.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.04%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.42%	+0.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.00%	-0.39%	+0.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.01%	0.45%	-0.44%

Volatility

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) is 0.11%, while BMO USD Cash Management ETF (ZUCM.TO) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that UBIL-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZUCM.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBIL-U.TO	ZUCM.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.11%	1.63%	-1.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.23%	3.96%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31%	5.72%	-5.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.46%	6.27%	-5.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.46%	6.27%	-5.81%

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBIL-U.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than ZUCM.TO's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UBIL-U.TO vs. ZUCM.TO - Dividend Comparison

UBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, which matches ZUCM.TO's 3.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
UBIL-U.TO Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD	3.75%	4.15%	5.35%	4.96%
ZUCM.TO BMO USD Cash Management ETF	3.72%	4.19%	4.88%	1.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO in my portfolio?

UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, UBIL-U.TO or ZUCM.TO?

On fees, UBIL-U.TO is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBIL-U.TO or ZUCM.TO?

UBIL-U.TO is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for ZUCM.TO.

What is the main difference between UBIL-U.TO and ZUCM.TO?

UBIL-U.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ZUCM.TO is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: Global X and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for UBIL-U.TO and 0.14% for ZUCM.TO.