UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO
UBIL-U.TO (Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD) and CASH.TO (Global X High Interest Savings ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBIL-U.TO is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Global X, while CASH.TO is a Money Market fund actively managed by Global X. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, UBIL-U.TO returned 3.35%/yr vs 2.44%/yr for CASH.TO. At a correlation of -0.00, they often move in opposite directions. UBIL-U.TO charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.11%/yr for CASH.TO.
Performance
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UBIL-U.TO is traded in USD, while CASH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CASH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBIL-U.TO achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's -0.41% return.
UBIL-U.TO
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.08%
- 6M
- 1.34%
- 1Y
- 2.84%
- 3Y*
- 3.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CASH.TO
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- -0.41%
- 6M
- 1.40%
- 1Y
- 0.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
UBIL-U.TO Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD | 1.08% | 2.99% | 3.74% | 2.64% |
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | -0.41% | 7.36% | -3.73% | 4.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2023 | -0.00 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank
UBIL-U.TO
CASH.TO
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBIL-U.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +8.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +14.70 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.16 | 1.04 | +3.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 36.27 | 0.31 | +35.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 152.88 | 0.63 | +152.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBIL-U.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.69 | 0.21 | +8.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 7.31 | 0.13 | +7.19 |
Drawdowns
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBIL-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.20%, smaller than the maximum CASH.TO drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBIL-U.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.20% | -9.42% | +9.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.08% | -2.96% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.13% | -6.41% | +6.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.26% | +2.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -2.75% | +2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.02% | 1.46% | -1.44% |
Volatility
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) is 0.12%, while Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that UBIL-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBIL-U.TO | CASH.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.12% | 0.77% | -0.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.23% | 3.36% | -3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33% | 4.47% | -4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.46% | 6.24% | -5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.46% | 6.24% | -5.78% |
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBIL-U.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison
UBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CASH.TO Global X High Interest Savings ETF | 2.19% | 2.53% | 4.37% | 5.06% | 2.30% | 0.10% |
UBIL-U.TO Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD | 2.72% | 2.97% | 3.68% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for UBIL-U.TO.
UBIL-U.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CASH.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for UBIL-U.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.
Find the right allocation for UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer