PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBIL-U.TO is traded in USD, while CASH.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CASH.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBIL-U.TO achieves a 1.08% return, which is significantly higher than CASH.TO's -0.41% return.


UBIL-U.TO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.23%
YTD
1.08%
6M
1.34%
1Y
2.84%
3Y*
3.35%
5Y*
10Y*

CASH.TO

1D
-0.40%
1M
-1.84%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
1.40%
1Y
0.91%
3Y*
2.44%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
UBIL-U.TO
Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD
1.08%2.99%3.74%2.64%
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
-0.41%7.36%-3.73%4.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2023

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBIL-U.TO
UBIL-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
UBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBIL-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBIL-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
UBIL-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBIL-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

CASH.TO
CASH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CASH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) and Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBIL-U.TOCASH.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+8.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+14.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

4.16

1.04

+3.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

36.27

0.31

+35.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

152.88

0.63

+152.25

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBIL-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 8.69, which is higher than the CASH.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBIL-U.TOCASH.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.69

0.21

+8.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

7.31

0.13

+7.19

Drawdowns

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBIL-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.20%, smaller than the maximum CASH.TO drawdown of -9.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBIL-U.TOCASH.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.20%

-9.42%

+9.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.08%

-2.96%

+2.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.13%

-6.41%

+6.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.26%

+2.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-2.75%

+2.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.02%

1.46%

-1.44%

Volatility

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD (UBIL-U.TO) is 0.12%, while Global X High Interest Savings ETF (CASH.TO) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that UBIL-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CASH.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBIL-U.TOCASH.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.12%

0.77%

-0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.23%

3.36%

-3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33%

4.47%

-4.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.46%

6.24%

-5.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.46%

6.24%

-5.78%

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBIL-U.TO has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than CASH.TO's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UBIL-U.TO vs. CASH.TO - Dividend Comparison

UBIL-U.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than CASH.TO's 2.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CASH.TO
Global X High Interest Savings ETF
2.19%2.53%4.37%5.06%2.30%0.10%
UBIL-U.TO
Global X 0-3 Month U.S. T-Bill ETF USD
2.72%2.97%3.68%2.73%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CASH.TO is cheaper at 0.11% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CASH.TO is cheaper with a 0.11% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for UBIL-U.TO.

UBIL-U.TO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while CASH.TO is Money Market. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for UBIL-U.TO and 0.11% for CASH.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBIL-U.TO and CASH.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer