UBEW vs. MAGS
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while MAGS is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for MAGS.
Performance
UBEW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 3.73% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -15.76%
- 6M
- -26.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- -1.08%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 3.73%
- 6M
- 3.62%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 33.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UBEW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -15.76% | -17.23% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 3.73% | 2.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and MAGS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | 0.29 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
MAGS
UBEW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBEW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | 1.55 | -2.61 |
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -29.91% | -7.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -18.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -29.91% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.82% | -3.55% | -31.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.96% | -4.70% | -20.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.37% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.80% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.34% | 20.08% | +22.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 25.94% | +16.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 25.94% | +16.40% |
UBEW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBEW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.85%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 31.85% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.
UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 31.85%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.
Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.29% for MAGS.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer