PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBEW vs. MAGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBEW vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than MAGS's 3.73% return.


UBEW

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.71%
YTD
-15.76%
6M
-26.05%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MAGS

1D
-1.08%
1M
2.17%
YTD
3.73%
6M
3.62%
1Y
31.34%
3Y*
33.71%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBEW vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
UBEW
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
-15.76%-17.23%
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
3.73%2.40%

Correlation

The correlation between UBEW and MAGS is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.29

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBEW vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBEW

MAGS
MAGS Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MAGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MAGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
MAGS Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MAGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MAGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBEW vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

UBEW vs. MAGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBEWMAGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-1.07

1.55

-2.61

Drawdowns

UBEW vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and MAGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBEWMAGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.34%

-29.91%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.82%

-3.55%

-31.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.96%

-4.70%

-20.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

Volatility

UBEW vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBEWMAGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

42.34%

20.08%

+22.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

42.34%

25.94%

+16.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.34%

25.94%

+16.40%

UBEW vs. MAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than MAGS's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBEW vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison

UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.85%, more than MAGS's 1.43% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
MAGS
Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF
1.43%1.48%0.81%0.44%
UBEW
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
31.85%8.98%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBEW and MAGS have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MAGS is cheaper at 0.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MAGS is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.

UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 31.85%, compared with 1.43% for MAGS.

Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.29% for MAGS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBEW and MAGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer