UBEW vs. BSCQ
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. UBEW is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.
Performance
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -15.76% return, which is significantly lower than BSCQ's 1.55% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -3.71%
- YTD
- -15.76%
- 6M
- -26.05%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCQ
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.55%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 4.41%
- 3Y*
- 5.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.47%
- 10Y*
- —
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -15.76% | -17.23% |
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.55% | 0.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and BSCQ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025 | -0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
BSCQ
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBEW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 7.06 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.07 | 0.60 | -1.67 |
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -37.34%, which is greater than BSCQ's maximum drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and BSCQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.34% | -16.50% | -20.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.10% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.13% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -13.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.82% | 0.00% | -34.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.96% | -2.85% | -22.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.02% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | BSCQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.43% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 42.34% | 0.63% | +41.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 3.30% | +39.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 42.34% | 4.77% | +37.57% |
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBEW vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.85%, more than BSCQ's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.14% | 4.05% | 3.53% | 2.54% | 1.91% | 2.42% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 2.92% | 0.51% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 31.85% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.
UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 31.85%, compared with 4.12% for BSCQ.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.10% for BSCQ.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and BSCQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer