UBEW vs. AMUB
UBEW (Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF) and AMUB (ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B) are both exchange-traded funds - UBEW is a fund fund actively managed by Roundhill, while AMUB is a MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Index. UBEW is actively managed, while AMUB is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. UBEW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for AMUB.
Performance
UBEW vs. AMUB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBEW achieves a -12.59% return, which is significantly lower than AMUB's 18.96% return.
UBEW
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- 9.37%
- 6M
- -16.34%
- YTD
- -12.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMUB
- 1D
- 2.18%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- YTD
- 18.96%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 13.69%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
UBEW vs. AMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | -12.59% | -16.62% |
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 18.96% | 2.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBEW and AMUB is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBEW vs. AMUB — Risk / Return Rank
UBEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AMUB
UBEW vs. AMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF (UBEW) and ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B (AMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBEW | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.21 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.60 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.07 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBEW vs. AMUB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBEW drawdown since its inception was -38.17%, smaller than the maximum AMUB drawdown of -79.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBEW and AMUB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBEW | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.17% | -79.46% | +41.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.02% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -17.22% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -78.86% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.37% | -4.56% | -27.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.19% | -29.01% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
UBEW vs. AMUB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBEW | AMUB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.99% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.36% | 14.40% | +28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.36% | 20.11% | +23.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.36% | 27.17% | +16.19% |
UBEW vs. AMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBEW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AMUB's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
UBEW vs. AMUB - Dividend Comparison
UBEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.89%, while AMUB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMUB ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Class B | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBEW Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF | 36.89% | 8.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBEW and AMUB have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMUB is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMUB is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for UBEW.
UBEW has the higher dividend yield at 36.89%, compared with 0.00% for AMUB.
They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for UBEW and 0.80% for AMUB.
Find the right allocation for UBEW and AMUB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer