UBER vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. UBER operates in Software - Application (Technology), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 6.60%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UBER vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.68% return.

UBER

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -7.82%
• YTD: -15.74%
• 6M: -19.10%
• 1Y: -17.97%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: —

JNJ

• 1D: 1.07%
• 1M: 4.96%
• YTD: 17.68%
• 6M: 15.11%
• 1Y: 57.15%
• 3Y*: 17.82%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: 10.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBER vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc.	-15.74%	35.46%	-2.03%	148.97%	-41.02%	-17.78%	71.49%	-29.19%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	17.68%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	11.44%	10.82%	7.40%

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and JNJ is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019	0.06

The correlation between UBER and JNJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap UBER : $142.62B JNJ : $588.98B
EPS UBER : $4.05 JNJ : $8.65
PE Ratio UBER : 16.98 JNJ : 27.85
PEG Ratio UBER : 0.11 JNJ : 0.93
PS Ratio UBER : 2.70 JNJ : 6.08
PB Ratio UBER : 5.76 JNJ : 7.25
Total Revenue (TTM) UBER : $53.69B JNJ : $96.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) UBER : $22.03B JNJ : $66.60B
EBITDA (TTM) UBER : $5.85B JNJ : $31.62B

Return for Risk

UBER vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER

UBER Risk / Return Rank: 18
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 19

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 96
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBER vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBER	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	3.42	-4.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	4.94	-5.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.61	-0.69
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	5.28	-5.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	15.52	-16.62

UBER vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBER vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBER	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.05%	-50.67%	-17.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.46%	-10.96%	-20.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.46%	-15.95%	-15.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.45%	-18.41%	-42.04%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.37%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.22%	-2.54%	-28.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-11.90%	-13.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.93%	3.72%	+14.21%

Volatility

UBER vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) has a higher volatility of 7.96% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that UBER's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBER	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	5.47%	+2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.21%	12.16%	+11.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.66%	16.94%	+15.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.82%	16.87%	+27.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.61%	18.48%	+32.13%

Dividends

UBER vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

UBER has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.18%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

UBER vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Uber Technologies, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UBER - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 5.95B and revenue of 13.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.0%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

UBER - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.92B and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 14.6%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

UBER - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Uber Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 263.00M and revenue of 13.20B, resulting in a net margin of 2.0%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBER and JNJ in my portfolio?

UBER and JNJ have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBER or JNJ?

UBER has higher volatility (7.96%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.