PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBER vs. ISLN.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than ISLN.L's -5.58% return.


UBER

1D
-1.01%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
-15.74%
6M
-19.10%
1Y
-17.97%
3Y*
18.47%
5Y*
6.60%
10Y*

ISLN.L

1D
5.80%
1M
-20.59%
YTD
-5.58%
6M
9.90%
1Y
86.37%
3Y*
41.38%
5Y*
19.06%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UBER
Uber Technologies, Inc.
-15.74%35.46%-2.03%148.97%-41.02%-17.78%71.49%-29.19%
ISLN.L
iShares Physical Silver ETC
-5.58%147.62%21.10%-0.76%3.39%-12.85%45.85%21.92%

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and ISLN.L is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019

0.08

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBER vs. ISLN.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER
UBER Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

ISLN.L
ISLN.L Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISLN.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBERISLN.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.62

1.96

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.09

4.36

-5.45

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the ISLN.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and ISLN.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum ISLN.L drawdown of -76.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and ISLN.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBERISLN.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-76.69%

+8.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.46%

-43.83%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.46%

-43.83%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.45%

-43.83%

-16.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.22%

-40.57%

+9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.67%

-53.73%

+28.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

17.93%

19.70%

-1.77%

Volatility

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 7.96%, while iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a volatility of 15.90%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISLN.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBERISLN.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

15.90%

-7.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.21%

54.92%

-31.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.66%

57.77%

-25.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.82%

35.79%

+9.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.61%

31.08%

+19.53%

Dividends

UBER vs. ISLN.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither UBER nor ISLN.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


UBER and ISLN.L have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBER and ISLN.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer