UBER vs. IONQ

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

UBER (Uber Technologies, Inc.) and IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — UBER in Software - Application, IONQ in Computer Hardware. Over the past 5 years, UBER returned 6.60%/yr vs 40.49%/yr for IONQ. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UBER vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBER achieves a -15.74% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 28.93% return.

UBER

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: -7.83%
• YTD: -15.74%
• 6M: -19.10%
• 1Y: -19.59%
• 3Y*: 18.47%
• 5Y*: 6.60%
• 10Y*: —

IONQ

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 4.69%
• YTD: 28.93%
• 6M: 14.90%
• 1Y: 49.44%
• 3Y*: 75.90%
• 5Y*: 40.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBER vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UBER Uber Technologies, Inc.	-15.74%	35.46%	-2.03%	148.97%	-41.02%	-17.78%
IONQ IonQ, Inc.	28.93%	7.42%	237.13%	259.13%	-79.34%	50.11%

Correlation

The correlation between UBER and IONQ is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.24
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021	0.36

The correlation between UBER and IONQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap UBER : $142.62B IONQ : $21.48B
EPS UBER : $4.05 IONQ : $0.86
PE Ratio UBER : 16.98 IONQ : 67.11
PS Ratio UBER : 2.70 IONQ : 99.37
PB Ratio UBER : 5.76 IONQ : 4.32
Total Revenue (TTM) UBER : $53.69B IONQ : $187.12M
Gross Profit (TTM) UBER : $22.03B IONQ : $71.25M
EBITDA (TTM) UBER : $5.85B IONQ : $405.86M

Return for Risk

UBER vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBER

UBER Risk / Return Rank: 18
UBER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
UBER Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
UBER Omega Ratio Rank: 18
UBER Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
UBER Martin Ratio Rank: 19

IONQ

IONQ Risk / Return Rank: 61
IONQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
IONQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
IONQ Omega Ratio Rank: 62
IONQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
IONQ Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBER vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBER	IONQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.60	0.53	-1.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.72	1.43	-2.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.16	-0.24
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.62	0.73	-1.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.09	1.33	-2.43

UBER vs. IONQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBER Sharpe Ratio is -0.60, which is lower than the IONQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBER and IONQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBER vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBER drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBER and IONQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBER	IONQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.05%	-90.00%	+21.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.46%	-67.61%	+36.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.46%	-67.61%	+36.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.45%	-90.00%	+29.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.22%	-29.53%	-1.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.67%	-50.88%	+25.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.93%	37.20%	-19.27%

Volatility

UBER vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Uber Technologies, Inc. (UBER) is 7.96%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that UBER experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBER	IONQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.96%	31.60%	-23.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.21%	68.80%	-45.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.66%	93.28%	-60.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.82%	100.48%	-55.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.61%	97.53%	-46.92%

Dividends

UBER vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither UBER nor IONQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBER and IONQ in my portfolio?

UBER and IONQ have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBER or IONQ?

IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to UBER (7.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBER dropped -68.05% vs IONQ's -90.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IONQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.53 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.