PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB82.L vs. VUTA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB82.L is traded in GBp, while VUTA.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the VUTA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB82.L achieves a 2.02% return, which is significantly lower than VUTA.L's 2.37% return.


UB82.L

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.27%
YTD
2.02%
6M
2.75%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
1.22%
5Y*
-0.10%
10Y*
0.43%

VUTA.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.78%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.99%
1Y
6.76%
3Y*
1.73%
5Y*
0.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.02%-0.40%1.34%-2.28%-4.86%-1.84%5.95%5.81%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
2.37%-1.12%2.51%-1.91%-1.88%-1.09%3.97%-19.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UB82.L and VUTA.L is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2019

0.97

The correlation between UB82.L and VUTA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB82.L
UB82.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
UB82.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB82.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB82.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
UB82.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB82.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VUTA.L
VUTA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUTA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) and Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UB82.LVUTA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.20

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

1.30

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.94

3.06

-0.11

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB82.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the VUTA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB82.L and VUTA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB82.L drawdown since its inception was -44.55%, which is greater than VUTA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB82.L and VUTA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB82.LVUTA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.55%

-25.05%

-19.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.86%

-5.19%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.79%

-21.06%

+13.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

-21.06%

+4.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-21.47%

-17.20%

-4.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-23.84%

-17.91%

-5.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.20%

-0.21%

Volatility

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) is 1.51%, while Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating (VUTA.L) has a volatility of 1.69%. This indicates that UB82.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VUTA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB82.LVUTA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

1.69%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.38%

4.48%

-0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.96%

6.05%

-0.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.43%

16.63%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.06%

17.31%

-7.25%

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UB82.L and VUTA.L have an expense ratio of 0.05%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UB82.L vs. VUTA.L - Dividend Comparison

UB82.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, while VUTA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.04%2.20%2.49%2.80%1.34%1.02%1.82%1.98%2.70%1.92%0.84%0.83%
VUTA.L
Vanguard USD Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, UB82.L and VUTA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.05% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB82.L and VUTA.L have the same expense ratio: 0.05% per year.

UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while VUTA.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate US Treasury Float Adjusted Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB82.L and VUTA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer