PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB74.L vs. IBTG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB74.L is traded in GBp, while IBTG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IBTG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with UB74.L having a 0.81% return and IBTG.L slightly higher at 0.83%.


UB74.L

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.21%
6M
0.35%
YTD
0.81%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
2.35%
10Y*
1.43%

IBTG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
6M
1.04%
YTD
0.83%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UB74.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.81%-2.06%5.76%-1.66%7.62%0.57%-0.46%0.26%12.35%
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.83%5.08%3.75%3.65%-4.56%-0.82%2.70%1.75%0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between UB74.L and IBTG.L is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2018

-0.01

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB74.L
UB74.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UB74.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB74.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB74.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
UB74.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB74.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTG.L
IBTG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) and iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UB74.LIBTG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.60

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.62

4.84

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.55

15.08

-13.53

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB74.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the IBTG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB74.L and IBTG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB74.L drawdown since its inception was -41.53%, which is greater than IBTG.L's maximum drawdown of -6.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB74.L and IBTG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB74.LIBTG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.53%

-6.15%

-35.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.61%

-0.67%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.93%

-0.85%

-8.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.34%

-6.13%

-10.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.45%

0.00%

-10.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-1.25%

-20.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.85%

0.22%

+1.63%

Volatility

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) has a higher volatility of 1.22% compared to iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IBTG.L) at 0.43%. This indicates that UB74.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB74.LIBTG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

0.43%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.50%

1.16%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.07%

1.74%

+4.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

2.43%

+5.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.59%

2.07%

+6.52%

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB74.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

UB74.L vs. IBTG.L - Dividend Comparison

UB74.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than IBTG.L's 3.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTG.L
iShares $ Treasury Bond 1-3yr UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.86%4.08%4.12%2.92%0.76%0.59%1.66%2.35%0.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB74.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.69%4.94%3.67%2.22%0.41%0.36%1.68%2.28%1.10%0.65%0.62%0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB74.L and IBTG.L have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB74.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB74.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBTG.L.

UB74.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while IBTG.L is Short-Term Bond. UB74.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while IBTG.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UB74.L and 0.10% for IBTG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB74.L and IBTG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer