PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB32.L vs. SHYU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB32.L is traded in GBp, while SHYU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SHYU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB32.L achieves a 26.16% return, which is significantly higher than SHYU.L's -1.70% return. Over the past 10 years, UB32.L has outperformed SHYU.L with an annualized return of 11.02%, while SHYU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.


UB32.L

1D
-1.51%
1M
6.18%
YTD
26.16%
6M
28.70%
1Y
54.13%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
11.02%

SHYU.L

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-1.70%
6M
-1.85%
1Y
1.64%
3Y*
2.26%
5Y*
3.17%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB32.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
26.16%26.36%8.34%3.61%-10.46%-1.87%13.90%13.43%-9.29%24.98%
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-1.70%-4.17%8.56%4.72%2.04%4.96%1.60%9.12%4.39%-3.89%

Correlation

The correlation between UB32.L and SHYU.L is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2012

0.35

Over the past year, the correlation between UB32.L and SHYU.L has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.35, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB32.L
UB32.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
UB32.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB32.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB32.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
UB32.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB32.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SHYU.L
SHYU.L Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UB32.LSHYU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.05

+0.54

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

0.25

+4.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.40

0.43

+17.97

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB32.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.25, which is higher than the SHYU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB32.L and SHYU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UB32.LSHYU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.25

0.24

+3.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.39

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.50

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.59

-0.09

Drawdowns

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB32.L drawdown since its inception was -30.25%, which is greater than SHYU.L's maximum drawdown of -15.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB32.L and SHYU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB32.LSHYU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.25%

-15.01%

-15.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.68%

-6.61%

-4.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.80%

-11.08%

-3.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.87%

-11.08%

-12.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.71%

-15.01%

-12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

-9.14%

+6.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.93%

-4.14%

-5.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.98%

3.83%

-0.85%

Volatility

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB32.L) has a higher volatility of 7.38% compared to iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF (SHYU.L) at 1.72%. This indicates that UB32.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHYU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB32.LSHYU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.38%

1.72%

+5.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.38%

4.34%

+10.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.01%

6.89%

+10.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

8.13%

+8.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.53%

9.74%

+8.79%

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB32.L has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than SHYU.L's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

UB32.L vs. SHYU.L - Dividend Comparison

UB32.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%, while SHYU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHYU.L
iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%6.32%5.76%4.82%4.27%5.16%5.58%5.52%5.74%5.16%5.87%
UB32.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
1.70%2.25%2.16%2.64%2.74%1.71%1.75%2.29%1.98%1.65%2.36%2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB32.L and SHYU.L have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB32.L is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB32.L is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYU.L.

UB32.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while SHYU.L is Corporate Bonds. UB32.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD, while SHYU.L tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for UB32.L and 0.50% for SHYU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB32.L and SHYU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer