PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB20.L vs. V3PB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UB20.L is traded in GBp, while V3PB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the V3PB.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB20.L achieves a 8.88% return, which is significantly lower than V3PB.L's 30.39% return.


UB20.L

1D
-0.89%
1M
0.41%
YTD
8.88%
6M
9.55%
1Y
17.52%
3Y*
10.59%
5Y*
6.00%
10Y*
8.09%

V3PB.L

1D
-2.23%
1M
10.60%
YTD
30.39%
6M
32.51%
1Y
54.32%
3Y*
19.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
8.88%12.00%6.98%-0.60%5.50%
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
30.39%21.87%3.24%8.19%-6.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UB20.L and V3PB.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2022

0.66

The correlation between UB20.L and V3PB.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB20.L
UB20.L Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
UB20.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB20.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB20.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
UB20.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB20.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

V3PB.L
V3PB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
V3PB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) and Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UB20.LV3PB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.56

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

4.52

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.51

16.28

-8.77

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB20.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is lower than the V3PB.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB20.L and V3PB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UB20.LV3PB.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

3.00

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.94

-0.26

Drawdowns

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB20.L drawdown since its inception was -30.04%, which is greater than V3PB.L's maximum drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB20.L and V3PB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB20.LV3PB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.04%

-15.03%

-15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-11.95%

+4.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.80%

-15.03%

-2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.03%

-2.23%

-0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-3.40%

-2.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.37%

3.33%

-0.96%

Volatility

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB20.L) is 3.70%, while Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (V3PB.L) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that UB20.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than V3PB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB20.LV3PB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

7.65%

-3.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.48%

15.68%

-7.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.12%

18.00%

-6.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.34%

15.95%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.15%

15.95%

+2.20%

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB20.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than V3PB.L's 0.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

UB20.L vs. V3PB.L - Dividend Comparison

UB20.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, while V3PB.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB20.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI Pacific (ex Japan) UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
2.93%3.86%3.26%3.97%3.64%2.60%3.05%4.03%4.36%3.43%4.00%5.16%
V3PB.L
Vanguard ESG Developed Asia Pacific All Cap UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB20.L and V3PB.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, V3PB.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

V3PB.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for UB20.L.

UB20.L tracks MSCI Pacific Ex Japan NR USD, while V3PB.L tracks FTSE Developed Asia Pacific All Cap Choice Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UB20.L and 0.17% for V3PB.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB20.L and V3PB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer