PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UB17.L vs. LGUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB17.L (UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and LGUK.L (L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - UB17.L tracks the MSCI EMU NR EUR while LGUK.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UB17.L returned 13.36%/yr vs 11.33%/yr for LGUK.L. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB17.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for LGUK.L.

Performance

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB17.L achieves a 5.70% return, which is significantly higher than LGUK.L's 3.73% return.

UB17.L

1D
0.30%
1M
2.62%
YTD
5.70%
6M
10.09%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.82%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.97%

LGUK.L

1D
-1.06%
1M
-0.31%
YTD
3.73%
6M
8.03%
1Y
17.97%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
11.33%
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UB17.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		5.70%45.25%4.09%19.69%-2.09%12.46%-2.84%12.93%-5.21%
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		3.73%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%17.94%-12.15%20.11%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between UB17.L and LGUK.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.32

The correlation between UB17.L and LGUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UB17.L
LGUK.L

Financial Services

42.2%
25.3%

Utilities

11.8%
5.5%

Industrials

10.2%
14.7%

Energy

7.7%
12.1%

Healthcare

6.0%
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
14.5%

Communication Services

5.1%
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

4.5%
3.7%

Basic Materials

3.5%
5.9%

Technology

2.4%
0.7%

Real Estate

1.5%
0.6%

Financial Services

UB17.L
42.2%
LGUK.L
25.3%

Utilities

UB17.L
11.8%
LGUK.L
5.5%

Industrials

UB17.L
10.2%
LGUK.L
14.7%

Energy

UB17.L
7.7%
LGUK.L
12.1%

Healthcare

UB17.L
6.0%
LGUK.L
14.7%

Consumer Defensive

UB17.L
5.2%
LGUK.L
14.5%

Communication Services

UB17.L
5.1%
LGUK.L
2.5%

Consumer Cyclical

UB17.L
4.5%
LGUK.L
3.7%

Basic Materials

UB17.L
3.5%
LGUK.L
5.9%

Technology

UB17.L
2.4%
LGUK.L
0.7%

Real Estate

UB17.L
1.5%
LGUK.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF

Often compared with UB17.L:
UB17.L vs. S7XP.LUB17.L vs. UC63.LUB17.L vs. LCPE.LUB17.L vs. IMV.LUB17.L vs. EEIP.LUB17.L vs. MMS.LUB17.L vs. EUFM.L
Often compared with LGUK.L:
LGUK.L vs. LCUK.LLGUK.L vs. VUGLGUK.L vs. S100.LLGUK.L vs. XASX.LLGUK.L vs. VUKG.LLGUK.L vs. SPYLGUK.L vs. ISF.L

Return for Risk

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UB17.L
UB17.L Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
UB17.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB17.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB17.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UB17.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB17.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UB17.LLGUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.13
1.24

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.87
1.84

+1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.24

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.92

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.19

6.51

+3.68

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB17.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB17.L and LGUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UB17.LLGUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13

1.24

+0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.31

0.82

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.52

+0.48

Drawdowns

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB17.L drawdown since its inception was -38.67%, which is greater than LGUK.L's maximum drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB17.L and LGUK.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UB17.LLGUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.67%

-33.76%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.68%

-9.30%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.56%

-12.30%

-0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.05%

-12.30%

-6.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.67%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.42%

-5.71%

+4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-4.82%

-0.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.08%

2.75%

+0.33%

Volatility

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB17.L) is 3.60%, while L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that UB17.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UB17.LLGUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

4.30%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.59%

12.53%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.13%

14.42%

-0.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.03%

13.86%

+6.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.37%

16.31%

+10.06%

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB17.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

UB17.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

UB17.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.77%, while LGUK.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB17.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU Value UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		3.77%3.37%3.64%3.87%4.01%2.74%2.39%4.11%4.02%3.42%5.21%4.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

UB17.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for UB17.L.

UB17.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for UB17.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB17.L and LGUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer