PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB06.L achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly lower than FEUZ.L's 12.51% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UB06.L having a 11.04% annualized return and FEUZ.L not far ahead at 11.52%.


UB06.L

1D
0.42%
1M
4.96%
YTD
7.99%
6M
9.65%
1Y
21.21%
3Y*
16.18%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
11.04%

FEUZ.L

1D
0.40%
1M
3.03%
YTD
12.51%
6M
15.50%
1Y
34.11%
3Y*
22.57%
5Y*
11.74%
10Y*
11.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB06.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
7.99%30.63%4.81%16.43%-6.51%14.17%5.04%18.97%-11.33%17.27%
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
12.51%48.45%3.89%9.28%-9.28%13.80%1.55%16.96%-15.00%24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between UB06.L and FEUZ.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2014

0.70

The correlation between UB06.L and FEUZ.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (3 years) to 0.85 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UB06.L
FEUZ.L

Financial Services

24.0%
10.6%

Industrials

20.7%
27.4%

Technology

15.7%
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
9.2%

Utilities

6.6%
8.3%

Healthcare

5.8%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
5.3%

Communication Services

4.4%
3.7%

Energy

4.2%
10.8%

Basic Materials

4.0%
7.5%

Real Estate

0.9%
6.0%

Financial Services

UB06.L
24.0%
FEUZ.L
10.6%

Industrials

UB06.L
20.7%
FEUZ.L
27.4%

Technology

UB06.L
15.7%
FEUZ.L
6.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UB06.L
8.3%
FEUZ.L
9.2%

Utilities

UB06.L
6.6%
FEUZ.L
8.3%

Healthcare

UB06.L
5.8%
FEUZ.L
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

UB06.L
5.5%
FEUZ.L
5.3%

Communication Services

UB06.L
4.4%
FEUZ.L
3.7%

Energy

UB06.L
4.2%
FEUZ.L
10.8%

Basic Materials

UB06.L
4.0%
FEUZ.L
7.5%

Real Estate

UB06.L
0.9%
FEUZ.L
6.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UB06.L
UB06.L Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
UB06.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB06.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB06.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
UB06.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB06.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

FEUZ.L
FEUZ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEUZ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) and First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UB06.LFEUZ.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.42

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

3.28

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

12.55

-5.73

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB06.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the FEUZ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB06.L and FEUZ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UB06.LFEUZ.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.50

2.34

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

0.80

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.74

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.79

-0.11

Drawdowns

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB06.L drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum FEUZ.L drawdown of -36.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB06.L and FEUZ.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UB06.LFEUZ.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-36.68%

+5.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.91%

-10.35%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.04%

-14.10%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-23.27%

+1.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.36%

-36.68%

+5.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.11%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.01%

-6.25%

+1.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.71%

+0.39%

Volatility

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB06.L) has a higher volatility of 4.48% compared to First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares (FEUZ.L) at 3.86%. This indicates that UB06.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEUZ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UB06.LFEUZ.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.48%

3.86%

+0.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.63%

11.96%

-0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

14.49%

-0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.14%

18.61%

-2.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

18.95%

-2.13%

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB06.L has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FEUZ.L's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

UB06.L vs. FEUZ.L - Dividend Comparison

UB06.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while FEUZ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEUZ.L
First Trust Eurozone AlphaDEX® UCITS ETF Class A Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UB06.L
UBS ETF (LU) MSCI EMU UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis
2.47%2.49%2.80%2.68%2.68%1.88%1.57%2.84%3.20%2.52%2.50%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


UB06.L and FEUZ.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB06.L is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB06.L is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FEUZ.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI EMU NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for UB06.L and 0.80% for FEUZ.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB06.L and FEUZ.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer