UB03.L vs. EUMV.L
UB03.L (UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis) and EUMV.L (Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR)) are both Europe Equities funds - UB03.L tracks the FTSE AllSh TR GBP while EUMV.L tracks the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB03.L returned 8.91%/yr vs 7.81%/yr for EUMV.L. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB03.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for EUMV.L.
Performance
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UB03.L is traded in GBp, while EUMV.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the EUMV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UB03.L achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than EUMV.L's 4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, UB03.L has outperformed EUMV.L with an annualized return of 8.91%, while EUMV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.81% annualized return.
UB03.L
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 5.64%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 20.72%
- 3Y*
- 15.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.59%
- 10Y*
- 8.91%
EUMV.L
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 5.99%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 7.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.81%
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB03.L UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 5.64% | 26.20% | 9.58% | 8.35% | 3.14% | 16.12% | -10.39% | 17.37% | -7.12% | 9.91% |
EUMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 4.73% | 18.06% | 9.37% | 4.56% | -9.49% | 15.84% | 6.52% | 11.60% | -4.02% | 17.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB03.L and EUMV.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2013 | 0.38 |
Over the past year, UB03.L and EUMV.L have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.38, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB03.L
EUMV.L
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UB03.L) and Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UB03.L | EUMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.13 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 0.78 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.61 | 2.70 | +5.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UB03.L | EUMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.00 | 0.68 | +1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.28 | 0.58 | +0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 | 0.61 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB03.L drawdown since its inception was -33.84%, which is greater than EUMV.L's maximum drawdown of -24.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB03.L and EUMV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB03.L | EUMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.84% | -24.37% | -9.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.09% | -9.06% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.11% | -10.56% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.11% | -17.87% | +5.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.84% | -24.37% | -9.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.00% | -2.95% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.91% | -3.97% | -0.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 2.62% | +0.49% |
Volatility
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis (UB03.L) has a higher volatility of 4.06% compared to Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) (EUMV.L) at 3.21%. This indicates that UB03.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUMV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB03.L | EUMV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.06% | 3.21% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.74% | 8.80% | +0.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.08% | 10.49% | +1.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.53% | 12.19% | +5.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.97% | 12.90% | +8.07% |
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB03.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EUMV.L's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
UB03.L vs. EUMV.L - Dividend Comparison
UB03.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, while EUMV.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUMV.L Ossiam Europe ESG Machine Learning ETF UCITS (EUR) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UB03.L UBS ETF (LU) FTSE 100 UCITS ETF (GBP) A-dis | 2.71% | 2.92% | 3.75% | 3.63% | 3.69% | 3.10% | 3.72% | 4.13% | 4.21% | 3.30% | 3.61% | 4.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UB03.L and EUMV.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB03.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB03.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for EUMV.L.
UB03.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP, while EUMV.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: UBS and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for UB03.L and 0.45% for EUMV.L.
Find the right allocation for UB03.L and EUMV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer