PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UB01.L vs. UC90.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UB01.L vs. UC90.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UB01.L (UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis) and UC90.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UB01.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC90.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L returned 11.99%/yr vs 7.57%/yr for UC90.L. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB01.L charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UC90.L.

Performance

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UB01.L achieves a 6.40% return, which is significantly lower than UC90.L's 21.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UB01.L has outperformed UC90.L with an annualized return of 11.99%, while UC90.L has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.

UB01.L

1D
0.60%
1M
4.75%
YTD
6.40%
6M
7.48%
1Y
18.69%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
11.63%
10Y*
11.99%

UC90.L

1D
-1.30%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
21.40%
6M
22.49%
1Y
30.42%
3Y*
12.90%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		6.40%28.34%6.43%19.85%-4.38%14.47%4.04%16.99%-6.90%18.45%
UC90.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc		21.40%9.58%4.52%-2.02%14.86%33.21%-1.26%5.91%-11.85%5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between UB01.L and UC90.L is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2015

0.03

The correlation between UB01.L and UC90.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to 0.03 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
UB01.L
UC90.L

Financial Services

25.0%
10.9%

Industrials

21.7%
6.6%

Technology

17.8%
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.4%
3.7%

Healthcare

5.1%
9.8%

Energy

5.0%
14.2%

Utilities

4.6%
1.1%

Basic Materials

3.5%
0.5%

Communication Services

2.4%
15.0%

Real Estate

-

-

Financial Services

UB01.L
25.0%
UC90.L
10.9%

Industrials

UB01.L
21.7%
UC90.L
6.6%

Technology

UB01.L
17.8%
UC90.L
31.0%

Consumer Cyclical

UB01.L
9.6%
UC90.L
7.3%

Consumer Defensive

UB01.L
5.4%
UC90.L
3.7%

Healthcare

UB01.L
5.1%
UC90.L
9.8%

Energy

UB01.L
5.0%
UC90.L
14.2%

Utilities

UB01.L
4.6%
UC90.L
1.1%

Basic Materials

UB01.L
3.5%
UC90.L
0.5%

Communication Services

UB01.L
2.4%
UC90.L
15.0%

Real Estate

UB01.L

-

UC90.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis

UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc

Often compared with UB01.L:
UB01.L vs. PSRE.LUB01.L vs. SPYUB01.L vs. LDEG.LUB01.L vs. SCHDUB01.L vs. IEURUB01.L vs. EUFM.LUB01.L vs. UC96.L
Often compared with UC90.L:
UC90.L vs. ROLG.LUC90.L vs. AIGC.LUC90.L vs. BCOG.LUC90.L vs. XDBG.LUC90.L vs. XFRM.LUC90.L vs. ENCG.LUC90.L vs. XBCU.L

Return for Risk

UB01.L vs. UC90.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UB01.L
UB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
UB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
UC90.L
UC90.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
UC90.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UC90.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
UC90.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
UC90.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
UC90.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UB01.LUC90.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.44
2.43

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.12
3.21

-1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.44

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

6.33

-4.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.42

14.07

-7.65

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UB01.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the UC90.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UB01.L and UC90.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UB01.LUC90.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.44

2.43

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.74

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.68

0.53

+1.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.61

0.38

+1.22

Drawdowns

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UB01.L drawdown since its inception was -29.27%, smaller than the maximum UC90.L drawdown of -41.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB01.L and UC90.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UB01.LUC90.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.27%

-41.45%

+12.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.38%

-4.79%

-6.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-11.47%

-2.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.12%

-19.19%

-1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.27%

-38.26%

+8.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-4.67%

+4.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.20%

-13.18%

+8.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.92%

2.16%

+1.76%

Volatility

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis (UB01.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UC90.L) have volatilities of 4.80% and 4.94%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UB01.LUC90.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.80%

4.94%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.76%

10.29%

+2.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.17%

12.48%

+3.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.79%

14.75%

+12.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

14.23%

+16.91%

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

UB01.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than UC90.L's 0.34% expense ratio.

Dividends

UB01.L vs. UC90.L - Dividend Comparison

UB01.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, while UC90.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UB01.L
UBS ETF (LU) EURO STOXX 50 UCITS ETF (EUR) A-dis		2.56%2.43%3.13%2.86%2.78%1.94%1.93%3.04%2.77%2.89%3.55%3.50%
UC90.L
UBS ETF (IE) CMCI Composite SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

UB01.L and UC90.L have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB01.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB01.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UC90.L.

UB01.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while UC90.L is Commodities. UB01.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while UC90.L tracks UBS CMCI (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.15% for UB01.L and 0.34% for UC90.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UB01.L and UC90.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer