UAUG vs. UXJL
UAUG (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August) and UXJL (FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds. UAUG is passively managed, while UXJL is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. UAUG charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for UXJL.
Performance
UAUG vs. UXJL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAUG achieves a 4.84% return, which is significantly lower than UXJL's 11.78% return.
UAUG
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 4.84%
- 6M
- 5.32%
- 1Y
- 15.19%
- 3Y*
- 14.57%
- 5Y*
- 7.97%
- 10Y*
- —
UXJL
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 6.02%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 6M
- 11.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UAUG vs. UXJL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 4.84% | 5.14% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 11.78% | 9.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAUG and UXJL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2025 | 0.93 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAUG vs. UXJL — Risk / Return Rank
UAUG
UXJL
UAUG vs. UXJL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) and FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July (UXJL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAUG | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.78 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.11 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.85 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.38 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAUG | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 1.87 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
UAUG vs. UXJL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAUG drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, which is greater than UXJL's maximum drawdown of -10.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAUG and UXJL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAUG | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.91% | -10.29% | -3.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.96% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -0.76% | +0.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.36% | -1.51% | -0.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility
UAUG vs. UXJL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAUG | UXJL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.60% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.51% | 13.90% | -8.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.89% | 13.90% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.72% | 13.90% | -5.18% |
UAUG vs. UXJL - Expense Ratio Comparison
UAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than UXJL's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
UAUG vs. UXJL - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAUG nor UXJL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAUG Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.83% |
UXJL FT Vest U.S. Equity Uncapped Accelerator ETF - July | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, UAUG and UXJL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, UAUG is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UAUG is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for UXJL.
UAUG and UXJL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UAUG and 0.85% for UXJL.
Find the right allocation for UAUG and UXJL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer