UAPR vs. KNOV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April) and KNOV (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. UAPR is passively managed, while KNOV is actively managed. Over the past year, UAPR returned 14.02% vs 24.28% for KNOV. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

UAPR vs. KNOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 6.99% return, which is significantly lower than KNOV's 8.98% return.

UAPR

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: 1.43%
• YTD: 6.99%
• 6M: 7.70%
• 1Y: 14.02%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: —

KNOV

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 1.86%
• YTD: 8.98%
• 6M: 8.75%
• 1Y: 24.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAPR vs. KNOV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	6.99%	6.27%	2.13%
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November	8.98%	11.91%	1.18%

Correlation

The correlation between UAPR and KNOV is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2024	0.72

The correlation between UAPR and KNOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

UAPR vs. KNOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPR

UAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
UAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
UAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
UAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

KNOV

KNOV Risk / Return Rank: 73
KNOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
KNOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
KNOV Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KNOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
KNOV Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPR vs. KNOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAPR	KNOV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.40	2.15	+2.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	7.63	3.16	+4.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.06	1.38	+0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	14.51	4.55	+9.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	71.55	15.82	+55.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UAPR vs. KNOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAPR Sharpe Ratio is 4.40, which is higher than the KNOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAPR and KNOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAPR	KNOV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.40	2.15	+2.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.12	-0.52

Drawdowns

UAPR vs. KNOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, roughly equal to the maximum KNOV drawdown of -15.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and KNOV.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAPR	KNOV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.61%	-15.03%	+0.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.97%	-5.36%	+4.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.84%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	-0.54%	+0.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.31%	-2.61%	-0.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.20%	1.54%	-1.34%

Volatility

UAPR vs. KNOV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) is 0.78%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November (KNOV) has a volatility of 2.23%. This indicates that UAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAPR	KNOV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.78%	2.23%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.26%	6.90%	-4.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.20%	11.37%	-8.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.88%	12.86%	-5.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.42%	12.86%	-4.44%

UAPR vs. KNOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UAPR and KNOV have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

UAPR vs. KNOV - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAPR nor KNOV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
KNOV Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - November	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	2.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UAPR and KNOV in my portfolio?

UAPR and KNOV have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UAPR or KNOV?

KNOV has higher volatility (2.23%) compared to UAPR (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAPR dropped -14.61% vs KNOV's -15.03%.

Which ETF is better, UAPR or KNOV?

On 1-year performance, KNOV leads with 24.28% vs 14.02% for UAPR. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, UAPR has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UAPR or KNOV?

Over the 1-year period, KNOV has performed better with a 24.28% return vs 14.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UAPR or KNOV?

UAPR and KNOV have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UAPR or KNOV?

UAPR and KNOV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.