UAPR vs. FBUF
Compare and contrast key facts about Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF).
UAPR and FBUF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UAPR is a passively managed fund by Innovator that tracks the performance of the S&P 500. It was launched on Mar 29, 2019. FBUF is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Apr 9, 2024.
Performance
UAPR vs. FBUF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UAPR vs. FBUF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 1.83% | 6.27% | 10.07% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | -2.37% | 14.01% | 10.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAPR achieves a 1.83% return, which is significantly higher than FBUF's -2.37% return.
UAPR
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 11.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.19%
- 5Y*
- 5.79%
- 10Y*
- —
FBUF
- 1D
- 1.51%
- 1M
- -3.11%
- YTD
- -2.37%
- 6M
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 14.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UAPR vs. FBUF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UAPR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FBUF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UAPR vs. FBUF — Risk / Return Rank
UAPR
FBUF
UAPR vs. FBUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) and Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAPR | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.65 | 1.33 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.50 | 1.87 | +0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.30 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.16 | +0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.95 | 9.34 | +5.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAPR | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 1.33 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 1.11 | -0.59 |
Correlation
The correlation between UAPR and FBUF is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UAPR vs. FBUF - Dividend Comparison
UAPR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FBUF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.17% |
FBUF Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF | 0.67% | 0.64% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UAPR vs. FBUF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAPR drawdown since its inception was -14.61%, which is greater than FBUF's maximum drawdown of -11.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPR and FBUF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAPR | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.61% | -11.09% | -3.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.58% | -6.81% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -4.18% | +4.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.40% | -1.42% | -1.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.83% | 1.58% | -0.75% |
Volatility
UAPR vs. FBUF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - April (UAPR) is 1.16%, while Fidelity Dynamic Buffered Equity ETF (FBUF) has a volatility of 3.11%. This indicates that UAPR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBUF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UAPR | FBUF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 3.11% | -1.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.12% | 6.52% | -4.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.16% | 10.77% | -3.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.88% | 9.87% | -2.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.50% | 9.87% | -1.37% |