PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAPIX vs. BMPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAPIX achieves a 38.41% return, which is significantly higher than BMPIX's 17.18% return. Over the past 10 years, UAPIX has outperformed BMPIX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while BMPIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.66% annualized return.


UAPIX

1D
-1.93%
1M
6.90%
YTD
38.41%
6M
31.22%
1Y
75.71%
3Y*
26.94%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
12.24%

BMPIX

1D
-2.26%
1M
1.77%
YTD
17.18%
6M
15.11%
1Y
21.68%
3Y*
10.03%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
10.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
38.41%12.77%10.42%22.26%-43.78%23.06%13.86%46.81%-26.88%24.36%
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
17.18%9.09%-5.35%15.30%-16.22%38.93%18.27%25.13%-26.81%34.96%

Correlation

The correlation between UAPIX and BMPIX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2001

0.76

The correlation between UAPIX and BMPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAPIX vs. BMPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAPIX
UAPIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
UAPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
UAPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

BMPIX
BMPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BMPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
BMPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) and ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAPIXBMPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.16

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

1.27

+2.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

3.48

+8.82

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAPIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the BMPIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAPIX and BMPIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAPIX drawdown since its inception was -88.51%, which is greater than BMPIX's maximum drawdown of -84.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAPIX and BMPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAPIXBMPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.51%

-84.22%

-4.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.32%

-18.38%

-3.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.86%

-34.54%

-15.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.82%

-38.50%

-23.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.18%

-61.41%

-10.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.93%

-8.33%

+6.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.98%

-24.07%

-11.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.55%

6.67%

-0.12%

Volatility

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Volatility Comparison

ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund (UAPIX) has a higher volatility of 12.99% compared to ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund (BMPIX) at 9.34%. This indicates that UAPIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAPIXBMPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.99%

9.34%

+3.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.65%

20.47%

+8.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.44%

26.27%

+13.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.32%

29.66%

+15.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.56%

32.11%

+14.45%

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UAPIX has a 1.60% expense ratio, which is lower than BMPIX's 1.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

UAPIX vs. BMPIX - Dividend Comparison

UAPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than BMPIX's 1.55% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BMPIX
ProFunds Basic Materials UltraSector Fund
1.55%1.81%0.94%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.16%
UAPIX
ProFunds UltraSmall Cap Fund
0.34%0.47%1.06%0.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UAPIX and BMPIX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAPIX has higher volatility (12.99%) compared to BMPIX (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAPIX dropped -88.51% vs BMPIX's -84.22%.

UAPIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 0.89), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAPIX and BMPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer