UAE vs. EMOP

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

UAE (iShares MSCI UAE ETF) and EMOP (AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. UAE is passively managed, while EMOP is actively managed. Over the past year, UAE returned 9.56% vs 45.62% for EMOP. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UAE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for EMOP.

Performance

UAE vs. EMOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI UAE ETF (UAE) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAE achieves a 3.39% return, which is significantly lower than EMOP's 29.00% return.

UAE

• 1D: -3.63%
• 1M: 4.26%
• YTD: 3.39%
• 6M: 1.27%
• 1Y: 9.56%
• 3Y*: 13.97%
• 5Y*: 10.19%
• 10Y*: 5.88%

EMOP

• 1D: 1.58%
• 1M: -0.38%
• YTD: 29.00%
• 6M: 29.89%
• 1Y: 45.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAE vs. EMOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
UAE iShares MSCI UAE ETF	3.39%	11.99%
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	29.00%	16.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UAE and EMOP is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2025	0.40

UAE vs. EMOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	UAE	EMOP
Financial Services	38.2%	24.0%
Real Estate	21.4%	2.3%
Industrials	10.8%	8.1%
Communication Services	10.2%	12.3%
Energy	7.9%	2.6%
Consumer Cyclical	4.9%	7.8%
Utilities	4.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	1.4%
Technology	0.9%	30.3%
Basic Materials	0.1%	7.0%
Healthcare	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

UAE vs. EMOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAE

UAE Risk / Return Rank: 15
UAE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
UAE Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
UAE Omega Ratio Rank: 16
UAE Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
UAE Martin Ratio Rank: 14

EMOP

EMOP Risk / Return Rank: 75
EMOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
EMOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
EMOP Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EMOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EMOP Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAE vs. EMOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI UAE ETF (UAE) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UAE	EMOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.42	2.13	-1.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	2.71	-1.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.40	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.45	3.56	-3.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	13.20	-12.12

UAE vs. EMOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAE Sharpe Ratio is 0.42, which is lower than the EMOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAE and EMOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UAE vs. EMOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAE drawdown since its inception was -60.49%, which is greater than EMOP's maximum drawdown of -12.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAE and EMOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAE	EMOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.49%	-12.88%	-47.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.50%	-12.88%	-8.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.47%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.07%	-3.44%	-7.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.84%	-2.02%	-21.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.85%	3.47%	+5.38%

Volatility

UAE vs. EMOP - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI UAE ETF (UAE) and AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMOP) have volatilities of 9.98% and 10.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAE	EMOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.98%	10.22%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.75%	19.64%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.86%	21.50%	+1.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.16%	21.54%	-2.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.63%	21.54%	-1.91%

UAE vs. EMOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

UAE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than EMOP's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

UAE vs. EMOP - Dividend Comparison

UAE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than EMOP's 0.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMOP AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.84%	0.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UAE iShares MSCI UAE ETF	4.46%	4.10%	3.32%	3.25%	2.67%	4.88%	4.75%	3.54%	5.56%	3.38%	4.74%	3.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UAE and EMOP in my portfolio?

UAE and EMOP have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UAE or EMOP?

EMOP has higher volatility (10.22%) compared to UAE (9.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAE dropped -60.49% vs EMOP's -12.88%.

Which ETF is better, UAE or EMOP?

On 1-year performance, EMOP leads with 45.62% vs 9.56% for UAE. On fees, UAE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, UAE has been the lower-risk option at 9.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UAE or EMOP?

Over the 1-year period, EMOP has performed better with a 45.62% return vs 9.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UAE or EMOP?

UAE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for EMOP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UAE or EMOP?

UAE has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 0.84% for EMOP.

What is the main difference between UAE and EMOP?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for UAE and 0.70% for EMOP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMOP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.