PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U10G.L vs. UB82.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U10G.L achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly lower than UB82.L's 0.06% return.


U10G.L

1D
0.33%
1M
1.53%
YTD
-0.78%
6M
-4.85%
1Y
1.76%
3Y*
-6.24%
5Y*
-6.94%
10Y*
-3.32%

UB82.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.02%
YTD
0.06%
6M
-0.35%
1Y
4.22%
3Y*
-0.26%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
U10G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist
-0.78%-5.06%-7.24%-5.81%-22.57%-5.74%10.21%8.17%0.97%-3.00%
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
0.06%0.56%0.48%-3.11%-6.16%-0.72%4.31%7.61%4.05%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between U10G.L and UB82.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2017

0.33

Over the past year, U10G.L and UB82.L have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.33, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U10G.L vs. UB82.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U10G.L
U10G.L Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
U10G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U10G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
U10G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
U10G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
U10G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

UB82.L
UB82.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
UB82.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UB82.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
UB82.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
UB82.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
UB82.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U10G.LUB82.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.13

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

0.98

-0.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

2.38

-2.05

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U10G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.18, which is lower than the UB82.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U10G.L and UB82.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U10G.LUB82.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

0.72

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.01

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.13

-0.32

Drawdowns

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U10G.L drawdown since its inception was -52.98%, which is greater than UB82.L's maximum drawdown of -23.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10G.L and UB82.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U10G.LUB82.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.98%

-23.85%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.49%

-4.86%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.41%

-7.79%

-12.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.90%

-16.39%

-25.51%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.32%

-19.18%

-32.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.54%

-16.84%

-10.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.48%

2.15%

+3.33%

Volatility

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) has a higher volatility of 2.19% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB82.L) at 1.49%. This indicates that U10G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UB82.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U10G.LUB82.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.19%

1.49%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.47%

4.44%

+3.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.77%

6.57%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.85%

12.53%

+2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.11%

15.99%

+0.12%

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

U10G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than UB82.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

U10G.L vs. UB82.L - Dividend Comparison

U10G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than UB82.L's 3.10% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
U10G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist
0.04%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.02%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.03%0.04%
UB82.L
UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis
3.10%2.20%2.52%2.82%1.33%0.99%1.81%1.93%2.69%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


U10G.L and UB82.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UB82.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UB82.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for U10G.L.

U10G.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while UB82.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10G.L and 0.05% for UB82.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U10G.L and UB82.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer