PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U10G.L vs. CBND.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U10G.L is traded in GBp, while CBND.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CBND.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U10G.L achieves a -1.46% return, which is significantly lower than CBND.L's 4.91% return.


U10G.L

1D
0.88%
1M
-1.86%
6M
-1.88%
YTD
-1.46%
1Y
0.29%
3Y*
-2.90%
5Y*
-6.55%
10Y*
-2.16%

CBND.L

1D
0.17%
1M
-1.38%
6M
3.82%
YTD
4.91%
1Y
6.97%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
U10G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist
-1.46%-5.06%-4.15%-3.04%-20.31%-3.63%12.61%-2.44%
CBND.L
Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.91%-2.44%6.50%-3.78%6.10%8.62%5.51%0.03%

Correlation

The correlation between U10G.L and CBND.L is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2019

0.27

The correlation between U10G.L and CBND.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.32 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U10G.L vs. CBND.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U10G.L
U10G.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
U10G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U10G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
U10G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
U10G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
U10G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CBND.L
CBND.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CBND.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBND.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBND.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
CBND.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBND.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) and Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


U10G.LCBND.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.20

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.03

2.04

-2.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.05

5.63

-5.58

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U10G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.03, which is lower than the CBND.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U10G.L and CBND.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U10G.L drawdown since its inception was -46.23%, which is greater than CBND.L's maximum drawdown of -16.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10G.L and CBND.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U10G.LCBND.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.23%

-16.35%

-29.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-3.40%

-7.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.14%

-9.09%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.82%

-16.35%

-19.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-44.71%

-3.99%

-40.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.10%

-7.46%

-13.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.01%

1.23%

+4.78%

Volatility

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist (U10G.L) has a higher volatility of 2.70% compared to Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (CBND.L) at 1.53%. This indicates that U10G.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBND.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U10G.LCBND.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

1.53%

+1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.48%

4.89%

+1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

6.40%

+3.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

7.92%

+6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.85%

8.34%

+6.51%

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

U10G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than CBND.L's 0.24% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

U10G.L vs. CBND.L - Dividend Comparison

U10G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than CBND.L's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CBND.L
Goldman Sachs Access China Government Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.04%2.20%2.45%2.54%2.72%2.52%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
U10G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Dist
0.04%0.03%3.47%2.86%3.24%2.26%2.37%2.95%3.19%3.30%4.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


U10G.L and CBND.L have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, U10G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

U10G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for CBND.L.

U10G.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while CBND.L tracks FTSE Goldman Sachs China Government Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Goldman Sachs. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10G.L and 0.24% for CBND.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U10G.L and CBND.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer