PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-UN.TO vs. HLIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while HLIT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the HLIT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-UN.TO achieves a -2.72% return, which is significantly lower than HLIT's 56.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with U-UN.TO having a 20.54% annualized return and HLIT not far behind at 19.87%.


U-UN.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
-4.50%
YTD
-2.72%
6M
-2.14%
1Y
4.74%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
36.24%
10Y*
20.54%

HLIT

1D
2.32%
1M
-9.39%
YTD
56.08%
6M
54.93%
1Y
66.49%
3Y*
-0.66%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-2.72%7.92%-12.03%78.52%13.64%183.71%20.34%-8.93%5.91%11.32%
HLIT
Harmonic Inc.
56.08%-28.66%10.05%-2.83%18.45%59.06%-7.50%58.44%21.83%-21.69%

Correlation

The correlation between U-UN.TO and HLIT is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2006

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-UN.TO
U-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

HLIT
HLIT Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HLIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HLIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
HLIT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HLIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
HLIT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Harmonic Inc. (HLIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


U-UN.TOHLITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.28

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.22

3.05

-2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.41

7.59

-7.18

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the HLIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-UN.TO and HLIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, roughly equal to the maximum HLIT drawdown of -80.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-UN.TO and HLIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-UN.TOHLITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.06%

-80.84%

-2.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.81%

-21.89%

+0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.84%

-46.46%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.84%

-52.43%

+6.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.84%

-58.16%

+12.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.76%

-13.09%

-9.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.45%

-50.55%

-3.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.52%

8.78%

+2.74%

Volatility

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) is 7.75%, while Harmonic Inc. (HLIT) has a volatility of 21.48%. This indicates that U-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HLIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-UN.TOHLITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

21.48%

-13.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.17%

39.66%

-15.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.69%

47.69%

-14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.41%

48.89%

+3.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.11%

50.95%

-8.84%

Dividends

U-UN.TO vs. HLIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither U-UN.TO nor HLIT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


U-UN.TO and HLIT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-UN.TO and HLIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer