PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-UN.TO vs. ETN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-UN.TO is traded in CAD, while ETN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ETN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-UN.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 34.72% return. Over the past 10 years, U-UN.TO has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 20.38%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.98% annualized return.


U-UN.TO

1D
-2.26%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
1.68%
6M
8.17%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
35.74%
10Y*
20.38%

ETN

1D
1.27%
1M
1.98%
YTD
34.72%
6M
25.77%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
34.46%
5Y*
28.74%
10Y*
24.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
1.68%7.92%-12.03%78.52%14.05%182.69%20.34%-8.93%5.91%11.32%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
34.72%-7.25%51.50%52.78%-0.57%45.38%27.68%35.75%-2.41%13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between U-UN.TO and ETN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2009

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-UN.TO vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-UN.TO
U-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U-UN.TOETNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.19

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

1.65

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

3.76

-1.62

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-UN.TO and ETN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U-UN.TOETNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

1.02

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

1.00

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.88

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.88

-0.69

Drawdowns

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than ETN's maximum drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-UN.TO and ETN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-UN.TOETNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.06%

-39.38%

-43.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.81%

-19.77%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.84%

-34.05%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.84%

-34.05%

-11.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.84%

-39.38%

-6.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-0.19%

-19.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-7.33%

-44.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

8.66%

+1.86%

Volatility

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) is 7.68%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 12.86%. This indicates that U-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-UN.TOETNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

12.86%

-5.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.47%

24.83%

-0.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.17%

31.88%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.21%

28.78%

+37.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.81%

28.56%

+22.25%

Dividends

U-UN.TO vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

U-UN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ETN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.02%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


U-UN.TO and ETN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-UN.TO and ETN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer