PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-UN.TO achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than ATRL.TO's -8.82% return. Over the past 10 years, U-UN.TO has outperformed ATRL.TO with an annualized return of 20.38%, while ATRL.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.05% annualized return.


U-UN.TO

1D
-2.26%
1M
-1.20%
YTD
1.68%
6M
8.17%
1Y
22.39%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
35.74%
10Y*
20.38%

ATRL.TO

1D
-0.30%
1M
-15.26%
YTD
-8.82%
6M
-6.89%
1Y
-12.42%
3Y*
34.25%
5Y*
20.72%
10Y*
5.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
1.68%7.92%-12.03%78.52%14.05%182.69%20.34%-8.93%5.91%11.32%
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
-8.82%16.29%79.01%79.18%-22.57%42.60%-27.19%-34.23%-17.75%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between U-UN.TO and ATRL.TO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 11, 2005

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-UN.TO
U-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

ATRL.TO
ATRL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) and SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U-UN.TOATRL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.96

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

-0.52

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.13

-1.09

+3.22

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is higher than the ATRL.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-UN.TO and ATRL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U-UN.TOATRL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

-0.37

+1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.62

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.13

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.19

0.41

-0.22

Drawdowns

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-UN.TO drawdown since its inception was -83.06%, which is greater than ATRL.TO's maximum drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-UN.TO and ATRL.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-UN.TOATRL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.06%

-74.02%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.81%

-23.75%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.84%

-25.85%

-19.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.84%

-42.72%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.84%

-74.02%

+28.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.27%

-23.75%

+4.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-51.87%

-20.36%

-31.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.52%

11.46%

-0.94%

Volatility

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-UN.TO) is 7.68%, while SNC-Lavalin Group Inc (ATRL.TO) has a volatility of 10.39%. This indicates that U-UN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATRL.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-UN.TOATRL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

10.39%

-2.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.47%

26.42%

-1.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.17%

33.32%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.21%

33.51%

+32.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

50.81%

38.01%

+12.80%

Dividends

U-UN.TO vs. ATRL.TO - Dividend Comparison

U-UN.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ATRL.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRL.TO
SNC-Lavalin Group Inc
0.10%0.09%0.10%0.19%0.34%0.26%0.37%0.80%2.50%1.91%1.80%2.43%
U-UN.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


U-UN.TO and ATRL.TO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-UN.TO and ATRL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer