PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TZINX vs. RAPZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TZINX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly lower than RAPZX's 13.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TZINX has underperformed RAPZX with an annualized return of 5.01%, while RAPZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.83% annualized return.


TZINX

1D
0.32%
1M
3.42%
YTD
9.13%
6M
11.15%
1Y
25.83%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
5.04%
10Y*
5.01%

RAPZX

1D
0.56%
1M
-1.26%
YTD
13.81%
6M
8.58%
1Y
17.74%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
7.37%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TZINX
Templeton Global Balanced Fund
9.13%27.85%0.73%14.45%-14.31%-1.44%1.70%7.58%-9.18%12.42%
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
13.81%11.96%4.35%3.88%-2.05%23.51%-0.84%17.77%-8.44%6.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TZINX and RAPZX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between TZINX and RAPZX has dropped to 0.45 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TZINX vs. RAPZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TZINX
TZINX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
TZINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TZINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TZINX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TZINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TZINX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

RAPZX
RAPZX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
RAPZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAPZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAPZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
RAPZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAPZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) and Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TZINXRAPZXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.51

1.77

+0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.48

2.17

+1.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.36

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

2.99

+0.09

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.67

11.16

+0.51

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TZINX Sharpe Ratio is 2.51, which is higher than the RAPZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TZINX and RAPZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TZINXRAPZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

1.77

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

0.58

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

0.54

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.36

+0.12

Drawdowns

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TZINX drawdown since its inception was -36.06%, which is greater than RAPZX's maximum drawdown of -30.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZINX and RAPZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TZINXRAPZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.06%

-30.69%

-5.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.42%

-5.96%

-2.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-8.84%

-2.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.60%

-19.31%

-10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.60%

-30.69%

+1.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.03%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.48%

-8.06%

+0.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.22%

1.59%

+0.63%

Volatility

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Volatility Comparison

Templeton Global Balanced Fund (TZINX) has a higher volatility of 3.13% compared to Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc (RAPZX) at 2.18%. This indicates that TZINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RAPZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TZINXRAPZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.13%

2.18%

+0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.35%

8.80%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

10.15%

+0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

12.83%

-0.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.33%

12.78%

-1.45%

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TZINX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than RAPZX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TZINX vs. RAPZX - Dividend Comparison

TZINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than RAPZX's 1.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAPZX
Cohen & Steers Real Assets Fund Inc
1.27%1.44%3.20%2.71%3.08%9.61%1.71%2.85%2.06%1.76%2.83%2.00%
TZINX
Templeton Global Balanced Fund
5.51%4.00%5.43%3.68%3.47%2.24%2.12%4.43%4.55%2.82%1.12%7.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


TZINX and RAPZX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TZINX has higher volatility (3.13%) compared to RAPZX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZINX dropped -36.06% vs RAPZX's -30.69%.

TZINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TZINX and RAPZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer