PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TZA vs. SPXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TZA vs. SPXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -40.43% return, which is significantly lower than SPXS's -25.49% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TZA having a -43.15% annualized return and SPXS not far ahead at -42.01%.


TZA

1D
3.75%
1M
-10.87%
YTD
-40.43%
6M
-38.50%
1Y
-65.59%
3Y*
-44.69%
5Y*
-30.11%
10Y*
-43.15%

SPXS

1D
2.19%
1M
-13.11%
YTD
-25.49%
6M
-24.86%
1Y
-48.73%
3Y*
-42.68%
5Y*
-34.76%
10Y*
-42.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TZA vs. SPXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
-40.43%-40.22%-32.22%-41.19%30.21%-50.80%-80.43%-53.25%25.06%-38.19%
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
-25.49%-41.53%-42.84%-45.97%36.14%-58.11%-70.47%-56.40%3.44%-44.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TZA and SPXS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2008

0.85

The correlation between TZA and SPXS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TZA vs. SPXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TZA
TZA Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
TZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TZA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TZA Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

SPXS
SPXS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
SPXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPXS Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
SPXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPXS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TZA vs. SPXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TZASPXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

0.75

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

-0.96

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.51

-1.62

+0.12

TZA vs. SPXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TZA Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is comparable to the SPXS Sharpe Ratio of -1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TZA and SPXS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TZASPXSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.16

-1.38

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

-0.69

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.63

-0.79

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.71

-0.83

+0.12

Drawdowns

TZA vs. SPXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SPXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and SPXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TZASPXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-100.00%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.28%

-50.77%

-16.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-88.34%

-84.13%

-4.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-90.83%

-90.11%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.71%

-99.63%

-0.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-100.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-98.00%

-96.30%

-1.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.51%

30.04%

+13.47%

Volatility

TZA vs. SPXS - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a higher volatility of 17.03% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares (SPXS) at 8.51%. This indicates that TZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TZASPXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.03%

8.51%

+8.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.64%

26.82%

+13.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

57.05%

35.54%

+21.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.43%

50.39%

+17.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.91%

53.54%

+15.37%

TZA vs. SPXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXS's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

TZA vs. SPXS - Dividend Comparison

TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than SPXS's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
SPXS
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 3X Shares
4.91%4.93%6.18%5.66%0.00%0.00%0.51%1.74%0.58%
TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
4.82%5.08%5.40%5.49%0.00%0.00%1.21%1.56%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


TZA and SPXS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TZA has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to SPXS (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs SPXS's -100.00%.

On 10-year performance, SPXS leads with -42.01% vs -43.15% for TZA. On fees, SPXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, SPXS has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPXS has performed better with a -42.01% return vs -43.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.

SPXS has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 4.82% for TZA.

TZA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SPXS is Inverse Equities. TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while SPXS tracks S&P 500 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 1.08% for SPXS.

TZA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-1.16 vs -1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TZA and SPXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer