TZA vs. QQQE
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and QQQE (Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while QQQE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TZA returned -44.17%/yr vs 15.77%/yr for QQQE. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for QQQE.
Performance
TZA vs. QQQE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -46.35% return, which is significantly lower than QQQE's 16.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TZA has underperformed QQQE with an annualized return of -44.17%, while QQQE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.77% annualized return.
TZA
- 1D
- 2.05%
- 1M
- -12.69%
- YTD
- -46.35%
- 6M
- -42.28%
- 1Y
- -67.58%
- 3Y*
- -46.88%
- 5Y*
- -30.52%
- 10Y*
- -44.17%
QQQE
- 1D
- -2.31%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- 16.25%
- 6M
- 14.96%
- 1Y
- 24.99%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 9.11%
- 10Y*
- 15.77%
TZA vs. QQQE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -46.35% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -50.80% | -80.43% | -53.25% | 25.06% | -38.19% |
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 16.25% | 14.58% | 6.98% | 33.76% | -24.47% | 17.93% | 37.85% | 36.43% | -5.40% | 26.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and QQQE is -0.78, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2012 | -0.79 |
The correlation between TZA and QQQE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.83 to -0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. QQQE — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
QQQE
TZA vs. QQQE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.28 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.00 | 2.67 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.56 | 8.96 | -10.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. QQQE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than QQQE's maximum drawdown of -32.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and QQQE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -32.14% | -67.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -68.07% | -9.41% | -58.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.28% | -21.38% | -67.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.56% | -32.14% | -59.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.74% | -32.14% | -67.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -3.24% | -96.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -97.99% | -5.16% | -92.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.46% | 2.80% | +40.66% |
Volatility
TZA vs. QQQE - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) has a higher volatility of 19.17% compared to Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares (QQQE) at 8.11%. This indicates that TZA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | QQQE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.17% | 8.11% | +11.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.84% | 12.74% | +30.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.62% | 15.68% | +42.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.66% | 20.55% | +47.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.98% | 20.80% | +48.18% |
TZA vs. QQQE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. QQQE - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.35%, more than QQQE's 0.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QQQE Direxion NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index Shares | 0.53% | 0.52% | 0.86% | 0.79% | 0.98% | 3.83% | 0.54% | 0.74% | 0.80% | 0.65% | 1.17% | 0.57% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 5.35% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and QQQE have a correlation of -0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TZA has higher volatility (19.17%) compared to QQQE (8.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs QQQE's -32.14%.
On 10-year performance, QQQE leads with 15.77% vs -44.17% for TZA. On fees, QQQE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, QQQE has been the lower-risk option at 8.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, QQQE has performed better with a 15.77% return vs -44.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QQQE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
TZA has the higher dividend yield at 5.35%, compared with 0.53% for QQQE.
TZA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while QQQE is Nasdaq-100. TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while QQQE tracks NASDAQ-100 Equal Weighted Index. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 0.35% for QQQE.
QQQE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and QQQE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer