TZA vs. HIBS
TZA (Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares) and HIBS (Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - TZA is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while HIBS is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the S&P 500® High Beta Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TZA returned -33.32%/yr vs -55.09%/yr for HIBS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TZA charges 1.11%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for HIBS.
Performance
TZA vs. HIBS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -45.77% return, which is significantly higher than HIBS's -55.49% return.
TZA
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -3.28%
- 6M
- -32.12%
- YTD
- -45.77%
- 1Y
- -62.64%
- 3Y*
- -42.78%
- 5Y*
- -33.32%
- 10Y*
- -42.81%
HIBS
- 1D
- 8.09%
- 1M
- 15.31%
- 6M
- -47.46%
- YTD
- -55.49%
- 1Y
- -73.19%
- 3Y*
- -57.50%
- 5Y*
- -55.09%
- 10Y*
- —
TZA vs. HIBS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | -45.77% | -40.22% | -32.22% | -41.19% | 30.21% | -50.80% | -80.43% | -13.76% |
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | -55.49% | -72.44% | -26.60% | -62.94% | -7.59% | -75.27% | -91.59% | -17.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between TZA and HIBS is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TZA and HIBS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TZA vs. HIBS — Risk / Return Rank
TZA
HIBS
TZA vs. HIBS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TZA | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.81 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | -0.93 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.42 | -1.55 | +0.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TZA vs. HIBS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum HIBS drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and HIBS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TZA | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -99.98% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -67.34% | -79.06% | +11.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.50% | -96.91% | +7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -91.74% | -98.70% | +6.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -99.98% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -98.00% | -93.20% | -4.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 44.18% | 47.30% | -3.12% |
Volatility
TZA vs. HIBS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) is 11.24%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares (HIBS) has a volatility of 29.60%. This indicates that TZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HIBS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TZA | HIBS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.24% | 29.60% | -18.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.46% | 64.22% | -21.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.67% | 77.53% | -19.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 67.48% | 83.90% | -16.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.78% | 95.33% | -26.55% |
TZA vs. HIBS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than HIBS's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
TZA vs. HIBS - Dividend Comparison
TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.89%, less than HIBS's 7.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HIBS Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bear 3X Shares | 7.97% | 8.42% | 5.34% | 6.49% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 0.13% | 0.00% |
TZA Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares | 4.89% | 5.08% | 5.40% | 5.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.21% | 1.56% | 0.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TZA and HIBS have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HIBS has higher volatility (29.60%) compared to TZA (11.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TZA dropped -100.00% vs HIBS's -99.98%.
On 5-year performance, TZA leads with -33.32% vs -55.09% for HIBS. On fees, HIBS is cheaper at 1.06% per year. On volatility, TZA has been the lower-risk option at 11.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TZA has performed better with a -33.32% return vs -55.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
HIBS is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.11% for TZA.
HIBS has the higher dividend yield at 7.97%, compared with 4.89% for TZA.
TZA is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while HIBS is Inverse Equities. TZA tracks Russell 2000 Index (-300%), while HIBS tracks S&P 500® High Beta Index. Their fees differ too: 1.11% for TZA and 1.06% for HIBS.
HIBS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.95 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TZA and HIBS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer