PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TZA vs. AMDG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TZA vs. AMDG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TZA vs. AMDG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TZA achieves a -7.36% return, which is significantly higher than AMDG's -16.65% return.


TZA

1D
-1.85%
1M
14.81%
YTD
-7.36%
6M
-14.42%
1Y
-58.53%
3Y*
-37.32%
5Y*
-24.98%
10Y*
-41.52%

AMDG

1D
6.82%
1M
8.29%
YTD
-16.65%
6M
21.40%
1Y
149.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TZA vs. AMDG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TZA has a 1.11% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TZA vs. AMDG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TZA
TZA Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
TZA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TZA Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
TZA Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TZA Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
TZA Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

AMDG
AMDG Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
AMDG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDG Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TZA vs. AMDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) and Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TZAAMDGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.85

1.16

-2.01

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-1.24

2.22

-3.46

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.85

1.29

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

2.65

-3.41

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.96

5.15

-6.10

TZA vs. AMDG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TZA Sharpe Ratio is -0.85, which is lower than the AMDG Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TZA and AMDG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TZAAMDGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.85

1.16

-2.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.70

0.42

-1.12

Correlation

The correlation between TZA and AMDG is -0.53. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TZA vs. AMDG - Dividend Comparison

TZA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than AMDG's 13.44% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TZA
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares
3.10%5.08%5.40%5.49%0.00%0.00%1.21%1.56%0.63%
AMDG
Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF
13.44%11.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TZA vs. AMDG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TZA drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than AMDG's maximum drawdown of -63.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TZA and AMDG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TZAAMDGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-63.04%

-36.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-76.19%

-56.48%

-19.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-49.06%

-50.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-97.98%

-27.74%

-70.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

61.24%

29.05%

+32.19%

Volatility

TZA vs. AMDG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Small Cap Bear 3X Shares (TZA) is 22.27%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDG) has a volatility of 32.60%. This indicates that TZA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMDG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TZAAMDGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.27%

32.60%

-10.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.41%

98.81%

-55.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.32%

129.88%

-60.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

67.52%

124.87%

-57.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

68.78%

124.87%

-56.09%