PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYA vs. SHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYA vs. SHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYA achieves a -5.08% return, which is significantly lower than SHY's 0.43% return.


TYA

1D
-0.63%
1M
-0.93%
YTD
-5.08%
6M
-6.88%
1Y
2.03%
3Y*
-2.45%
5Y*
10Y*

SHY

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.08%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.69%
1Y
3.32%
3Y*
4.03%
5Y*
1.71%
10Y*
1.65%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYA vs. SHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TYA
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
-5.08%14.38%-9.63%-2.23%-37.62%-0.68%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.43%4.95%3.92%4.16%-3.88%-0.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TYA and SHY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 29, 2021

0.87

The correlation between TYA and SHY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYA vs. SHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYA
TYA Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
TYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYA Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYA Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYA vs. SHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYASHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.51

-0.47

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.17

3.75

-3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

15.21

-14.72

TYA vs. SHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYA Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the SHY Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYA and SHY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYASHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

2.49

-2.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.51

1.28

-1.80

Drawdowns

TYA vs. SHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYA drawdown since its inception was -51.15%, which is greater than SHY's maximum drawdown of -5.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYA and SHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYASHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-51.15%

-5.71%

-45.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.80%

-0.89%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.51%

-0.97%

-21.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.49%

-0.31%

-41.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.85%

-0.52%

-35.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.17%

0.22%

+3.95%

Volatility

TYA vs. SHY - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF (TYA) has a higher volatility of 4.11% compared to iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) at 0.35%. This indicates that TYA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYASHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

0.35%

+3.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.81%

0.92%

+7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

1.34%

+11.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.57%

1.98%

+18.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.57%

1.57%

+19.00%

TYA vs. SHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TYA and SHY have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TYA vs. SHY - Dividend Comparison

TYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, more than SHY's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%
TYA
Simplify Intermediate Term Treasury Futures Strategy ETF
3.87%3.85%4.84%4.28%2.23%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYA and SHY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYA has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to SHY (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYA dropped -51.15% vs SHY's -5.71%.

On 3-year performance, SHY leads with 4.03% vs -2.45% for TYA. Both ETFs have the same 0.15% expense ratio. On volatility, SHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHY has performed better with a 4.03% return vs -2.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TYA and SHY have the same expense ratio: 0.15% per year.

TYA has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 3.68% for SHY.

They also come from different issuers: Simplify and iShares.

SHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYA and SHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer