TXUG vs. FPXI
TXUG (Thornburg International Growth ETF) and FPXI (First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TXUG is actively managed, while FPXI is passively managed. Over the past year, TXUG returned 5.65% vs 49.62% for FPXI. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.70% expense ratio.
Performance
TXUG vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXUG achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 34.41% return.
TXUG
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 4.08%
- YTD
- 9.55%
- 6M
- 9.59%
- 1Y
- 5.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FPXI
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 13.37%
- YTD
- 34.41%
- 6M
- 33.60%
- 1Y
- 49.62%
- 3Y*
- 27.44%
- 5Y*
- 4.04%
- 10Y*
- 12.89%
TXUG vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TXUG Thornburg International Growth ETF | 9.55% | -1.72% |
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 34.41% | 17.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXUG and FPXI is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TXUG and FPXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXUG vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank
TXUG
FPXI
TXUG vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXUG | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.79 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.35 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.44 | 3.38 | -2.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.21 | 11.66 | -10.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXUG | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 2.13 | -1.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.19 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.48 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
TXUG vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXUG drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXUG and FPXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXUG | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.58% | -55.78% | +37.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -14.77% | +1.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -50.75% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.36% | -0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.21% | -20.26% | +16.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.67% | 4.27% | +0.40% |
Volatility
TXUG vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) is 5.32%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that TXUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXUG | FPXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.32% | 8.88% | -3.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.29% | 19.74% | -5.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.93% | 23.42% | -6.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 21.57% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.61% | 21.18% | -1.57% |
TXUG vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TXUG and FPXI have an expense ratio of 0.70%.
Dividends
TXUG vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison
TXUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than FPXI's 0.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FPXI First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF | 0.59% | 0.70% | 0.93% | 0.71% | 1.13% | 0.71% | 0.18% | 0.67% | 1.75% | 0.75% | 2.09% | 1.34% |
TXUG Thornburg International Growth ETF | 0.47% | 0.51% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TXUG and FPXI have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FPXI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to TXUG (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXUG dropped -18.58% vs FPXI's -55.78%.
On 1-year performance, FPXI leads with 49.62% vs 5.65% for TXUG. Both ETFs have the same 0.70% expense ratio. On volatility, TXUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 49.62% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TXUG and FPXI have the same expense ratio: 0.70% per year.
FPXI has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.47% for TXUG.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and First Trust.
FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXUG and FPXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer