PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXUG vs. AVEM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXUG vs. AVEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXUG achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than AVEM's 27.59% return.


TXUG

1D
-0.64%
1M
4.08%
YTD
9.55%
6M
9.59%
1Y
5.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVEM

1D
-1.39%
1M
8.65%
YTD
27.59%
6M
29.75%
1Y
55.00%
3Y*
26.07%
5Y*
9.92%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXUG vs. AVEM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TXUG and AVEM is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 24, 2025

0.79

The correlation between TXUG and AVEM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXUG vs. AVEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXUG
TXUG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TXUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXUG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TXUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXUG Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

AVEM
AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXUG vs. AVEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) and Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TXUGAVEMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.51

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.44

4.21

-3.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

16.70

-15.48

TXUG vs. AVEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXUG Sharpe Ratio is 0.34, which is lower than the AVEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXUG and AVEM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TXUGAVEMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

2.84

-2.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.66

-0.37

Drawdowns

TXUG vs. AVEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXUG drawdown since its inception was -18.58%, smaller than the maximum AVEM drawdown of -36.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXUG and AVEM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXUGAVEMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.58%

-36.05%

+17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.93%

-13.13%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.64%

-1.39%

+0.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.21%

-10.09%

+5.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

3.30%

+1.37%

Volatility

TXUG vs. AVEM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg International Growth ETF (TXUG) is 5.32%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) has a volatility of 8.33%. This indicates that TXUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXUGAVEMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

8.33%

-3.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

16.72%

-2.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.93%

19.45%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.61%

18.34%

+1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

20.55%

-0.94%

TXUG vs. AVEM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXUG has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than AVEM's 0.33% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXUG vs. AVEM - Dividend Comparison

TXUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%, less than AVEM's 1.98% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVEM
Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF
1.98%2.45%3.17%3.06%2.77%2.61%1.60%0.35%
TXUG
Thornburg International Growth ETF
0.47%0.51%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXUG and AVEM have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVEM has higher volatility (8.33%) compared to TXUG (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXUG dropped -18.58% vs AVEM's -36.05%.

On 1-year performance, AVEM leads with 55.00% vs 5.65% for TXUG. On fees, AVEM is cheaper at 0.33% per year. On volatility, TXUG has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 55.00% return vs 5.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVEM is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for TXUG.

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 1.98%, compared with 0.47% for TXUG.

TXUG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AVEM is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for TXUG and 0.33% for AVEM.

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXUG and AVEM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer