TXUE vs. GMOI
TXUE (Thornburg International Equity ETF) and GMOI (GMO International Value ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. TXUE is actively managed, while GMOI is passively managed. Over the past year, TXUE returned 20.99% vs 37.64% for GMOI. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TXUE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GMOI.
Performance
TXUE vs. GMOI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TXUE achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than GMOI's 13.97% return.
TXUE
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- YTD
- 11.09%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 20.99%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GMOI
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 2.57%
- YTD
- 13.97%
- 6M
- 17.28%
- 1Y
- 37.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TXUE vs. GMOI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TXUE Thornburg International Equity ETF | 11.09% | 25.67% |
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 13.97% | 41.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between TXUE and GMOI is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2025 | 0.86 |
The correlation between TXUE and GMOI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TXUE vs. GMOI — Risk / Return Rank
TXUE
GMOI
TXUE vs. GMOI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg International Equity ETF (TXUE) and GMO International Value ETF (GMOI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TXUE | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.51 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.89 | 4.52 | -2.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.03 | 17.89 | -10.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TXUE | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | 2.88 | -1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.69 | 2.17 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
TXUE vs. GMOI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TXUE drawdown since its inception was -12.97%, smaller than the maximum GMOI drawdown of -14.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXUE and GMOI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TXUE | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.97% | -14.67% | +1.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.14% | -8.36% | -2.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.18% | -0.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -1.70% | -0.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.11% | +0.88% |
Volatility
TXUE vs. GMOI - Volatility Comparison
Thornburg International Equity ETF (TXUE) has a higher volatility of 4.32% compared to GMO International Value ETF (GMOI) at 3.88%. This indicates that TXUE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GMOI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TXUE | GMOI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.32% | 3.88% | +0.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 10.29% | +1.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.91% | 13.15% | +0.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 15.58% | +0.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.51% | 15.58% | +0.93% |
TXUE vs. GMOI - Expense Ratio Comparison
TXUE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GMOI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
TXUE vs. GMOI - Dividend Comparison
TXUE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than GMOI's 2.40% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GMOI GMO International Value ETF | 2.40% | 2.74% | 0.54% |
TXUE Thornburg International Equity ETF | 0.97% | 1.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TXUE and GMOI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TXUE has higher volatility (4.32%) compared to GMOI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXUE dropped -12.97% vs GMOI's -14.67%.
On 1-year performance, GMOI leads with 37.64% vs 20.99% for TXUE. On fees, GMOI is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GMOI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GMOI has performed better with a 37.64% return vs 20.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GMOI is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for TXUE.
GMOI has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 0.97% for TXUE.
They also come from different issuers: Thornburg and GMO. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for TXUE and 0.60% for GMOI.
GMOI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TXUE and GMOI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer