PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TXS vs. RSHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TXS vs. RSHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXS achieves a 11.72% return, which is significantly lower than RSHO's 39.40% return.


TXS

1D
0.05%
1M
-0.70%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.00%
1Y
15.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RSHO

1D
0.00%
1M
9.15%
YTD
39.40%
6M
36.26%
1Y
59.78%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXS vs. RSHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
11.72%10.31%24.29%5.77%
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
39.40%19.23%17.28%8.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TXS and RSHO is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.77

The correlation between TXS and RSHO shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TXS vs. RSHO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TXS
RSHO

Energy

19.1%
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

17.0%
3.7%

Technology

15.1%
11.8%

Industrials

14.6%
74.2%

Real Estate

12.1%

-

Healthcare

9.0%

-

Financial Services

7.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

2.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.7%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Basic Materials

0.3%
8.1%

Energy

TXS
19.1%
RSHO
0.9%

Consumer Cyclical

TXS
17.0%
RSHO
3.7%

Technology

TXS
15.1%
RSHO
11.8%

Industrials

TXS
14.6%
RSHO
74.2%

Real Estate

TXS
12.1%
RSHO

-

Healthcare

TXS
9.0%
RSHO

-

Financial Services

TXS
7.0%
RSHO
0.8%

Communication Services

TXS
2.4%
RSHO

-

Consumer Defensive

TXS
1.7%
RSHO

-

Utilities

TXS
1.7%
RSHO

-

Basic Materials

TXS
0.3%
RSHO
8.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TXS vs. RSHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXS
TXS Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXS Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
TXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXS Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

RSHO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXS vs. RSHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) and Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TXSRSHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.43

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

4.45

-2.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.92

16.97

-9.05

TXS vs. RSHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXS Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the RSHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXS and RSHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TXS vs. RSHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXS drawdown since its inception was -19.69%, smaller than the maximum RSHO drawdown of -27.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXS and RSHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TXSRSHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.69%

-27.31%

+7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.54%

-14.64%

+8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.56%

0.00%

-1.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.81%

-4.27%

+1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.83%

-1.90%

Volatility

TXS vs. RSHO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF (TXS) is 3.14%, while Tema American Reshoring ETF (RSHO) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that TXS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TXSRSHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

9.26%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.18%

20.99%

-12.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.71%

24.93%

-13.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.83%

22.82%

-6.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.83%

22.82%

-6.99%

TXS vs. RSHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXS has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than RSHO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TXS vs. RSHO - Dividend Comparison

TXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.75%, while RSHO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023
RSHO
Tema American Reshoring ETF
0.21%0.30%0.26%0.25%
TXS
Texas Capital Texas Equity Index ETF
0.75%0.82%0.86%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TXS and RSHO have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RSHO has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to TXS (3.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TXS dropped -19.69% vs RSHO's -27.31%.

On 1-year performance, RSHO leads with 59.78% vs 15.28% for TXS. On fees, TXS is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, TXS has been the lower-risk option at 3.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RSHO has performed better with a 59.78% return vs 15.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TXS is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for RSHO.

TXS has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.21% for RSHO.

They also come from different issuers: Texas Capital and Tema. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for TXS and 0.75% for RSHO.

RSHO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TXS and RSHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer