TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TXF.TO (CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common) and BGIN.NEO (BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series) are both Technology Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TXF.TO returned 64.62% vs 88.73% for BGIN.NEO. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TXF.TO charges 0.71%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for BGIN.NEO.

Performance

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TXF.TO achieves a 31.75% return, which is significantly lower than BGIN.NEO's 54.53% return.

TXF.TO

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 18.07%
• YTD: 31.75%
• 6M: 31.92%
• 1Y: 64.62%
• 3Y*: 33.10%
• 5Y*: 18.49%
• 10Y*: 19.77%

BGIN.NEO

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: 21.71%
• YTD: 54.53%
• 6M: 53.21%
• 1Y: 88.73%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common	31.75%	24.81%	18.69%	17.91%
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series	54.53%	19.37%	32.08%	11.72%

Correlation

The correlation between TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023	0.47

Over the past year, TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO have become more correlated (0.71) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TXF.TO

TXF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 85
TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
TXF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
TXF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TXF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
TXF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

BGIN.NEO

BGIN.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 92
BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
BGIN.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
BGIN.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) and BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TXF.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.24	3.44	-0.21
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.90	4.02	-0.12
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.53	1.64	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	6.75	-2.54
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.54	21.35	-5.81
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TXF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.24, which is comparable to the BGIN.NEO Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TXF.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.24	3.44	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	1.57	-0.76

Drawdowns

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TXF.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.23%, which is greater than BGIN.NEO's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	TXF.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.23%	-29.19%	-12.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.43%	-13.23%	-2.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.38%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-41.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.17%	-4.44%	-1.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.17%	4.17%	0.00%

Volatility

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common (TXF.TO) is 5.71%, while BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series (BGIN.NEO) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that TXF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGIN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TXF.TO	BGIN.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	9.24%	-3.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.39%	21.40%	-5.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.09%	25.92%	-5.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.63%	26.10%	-1.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.54%	26.10%	-2.56%

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TXF.TO has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than BGIN.NEO's 1.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

TXF.TO vs. BGIN.NEO - Dividend Comparison

TXF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.11%, more than BGIN.NEO's 0.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BGIN.NEO BMO Global Innovators Fund Active ETF Series	0.19%	0.30%	0.36%	0.12%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TXF.TO CI Tech Giants Covered Call Common	9.11%	10.59%	9.76%	7.48%	14.13%	7.77%	11.01%	7.29%	9.29%	4.89%	6.16%	6.15%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO in my portfolio?

TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TXF.TO or BGIN.NEO?

On fees, TXF.TO is cheaper at 0.71% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TXF.TO or BGIN.NEO?

TXF.TO is cheaper with a 0.71% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.

What is the main difference between TXF.TO and BGIN.NEO?

They also come from different issuers: CI Investments and BMO. Their fees differ too: 0.71% for TXF.TO and 1.07% for BGIN.NEO.