PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWUSX vs. DFFGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWUSX achieves a 0.36% return, which is significantly lower than DFFGX's 1.38% return. Over the past 10 years, TWUSX has outperformed DFFGX with an annualized return of 1.51%, while DFFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.23% annualized return.


TWUSX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.10%
YTD
0.36%
6M
0.66%
1Y
3.30%
3Y*
3.83%
5Y*
1.48%
10Y*
1.51%

DFFGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.20%
YTD
1.38%
6M
1.72%
1Y
2.79%
3Y*
4.29%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWUSX
American Century Short-Term Government Fund
0.36%4.94%3.59%3.70%-4.31%-0.09%3.36%2.91%1.12%0.22%
DFFGX
DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio
1.38%3.12%5.29%5.01%-4.41%-1.27%0.39%2.52%1.17%0.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TWUSX and DFFGX is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.06

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 1987

0.49

Over the past year, the correlation between TWUSX and DFFGX has dropped to 0.16 - well below their long-term average of 0.49, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWUSX vs. DFFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWUSX
TWUSX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
TWUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
TWUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DFFGX
DFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
DFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) and DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWUSXDFFGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

2.73

-1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

2.83

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.83

10.57

+1.26

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is comparable to the DFFGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWUSX and DFFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWUSXDFFGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.84

2.33

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

1.00

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

0.79

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.21

-0.21

Drawdowns

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWUSX drawdown since its inception was -91.06%, which is greater than DFFGX's maximum drawdown of -6.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWUSX and DFFGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWUSXDFFGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.06%

-6.49%

-84.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.98%

-1.00%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.09%

-1.19%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.81%

-6.49%

+0.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.85%

-6.49%

+0.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.62%

-0.10%

-64.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.98%

-0.77%

-76.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.27%

+0.01%

Volatility

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Volatility Comparison

American Century Short-Term Government Fund (TWUSX) has a higher volatility of 0.55% compared to DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio (DFFGX) at 0.35%. This indicates that TWUSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWUSXDFFGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.55%

0.35%

+0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.24%

0.52%

+0.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81%

1.21%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.31%

1.84%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

1.56%

+0.26%

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWUSX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than DFFGX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWUSX vs. DFFGX - Dividend Comparison

TWUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.60%, more than DFFGX's 2.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFFGX
DFA Short-Term Government Portfolio
2.84%2.98%4.87%3.57%1.85%0.15%0.29%1.83%1.53%1.18%0.99%1.27%
TWUSX
American Century Short-Term Government Fund
3.60%3.70%4.06%3.83%1.12%1.05%0.72%1.81%1.74%1.06%0.57%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWUSX and DFFGX have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWUSX has higher volatility (0.55%) compared to DFFGX (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWUSX dropped -91.06% vs DFFGX's -6.49%.

DFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWUSX and DFFGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer