PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWUIX vs. ACFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund I Class (TWUIX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWUIX achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly higher than ACFOX's -2.34% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TWUIX having a 17.10% annualized return and ACFOX not far ahead at 17.70%.


TWUIX

1D
-2.19%
1M
-1.08%
6M
0.81%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
8.96%
3Y*
16.60%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
17.10%
ALL TIME*
9.87%

ACFOX

1D
-3.08%
1M
-3.19%
6M
-3.49%
YTD
-2.34%
1Y
9.66%
3Y*
20.86%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
17.70%
ALL TIME*
11.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWUIX
American Century Ultra Fund I Class
0.54%12.88%29.80%43.63%-32.25%23.70%50.09%34.90%0.90%31.63%
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
-2.34%20.51%43.30%35.66%-36.32%7.08%73.31%32.30%6.51%34.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TWUIX and ACFOX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 31, 2006

0.93

The correlation between TWUIX and ACFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWUIX vs. ACFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWUIX
TWUIX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TWUIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWUIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWUIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
TWUIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWUIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

ACFOX
ACFOX Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
ACFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
ACFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund I Class (TWUIX) and American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWUIXACFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.09

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.57

0.56

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.82

1.75

+0.07

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWUIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is comparable to the ACFOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWUIX and ACFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWUIX drawdown since its inception was -61.41%, roughly equal to the maximum ACFOX drawdown of -58.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWUIX and ACFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWUIXACFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.41%

-58.92%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.64%

-16.52%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.82%

-27.03%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.12%

-43.77%

+8.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

-43.77%

+8.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.76%

-11.59%

+2.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.08%

-14.65%

-3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.93%

5.30%

-0.37%

Volatility

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Ultra Fund I Class (TWUIX) is 5.49%, while American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund (ACFOX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that TWUIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWUIXACFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

6.86%

-1.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.04%

17.00%

-2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.89%

20.97%

-3.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.78%

25.62%

-2.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.15%

23.94%

-1.79%

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWUIX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than ACFOX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWUIX vs. ACFOX - Dividend Comparison

TWUIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.70%, more than ACFOX's 7.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACFOX
American Century Investments Focused Dynamic Growth Fund
7.74%7.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.48%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.15%1.33%
TWUIX
American Century Ultra Fund I Class
10.70%10.76%3.36%5.73%7.03%6.46%2.68%4.10%7.94%5.66%4.44%5.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TWUIX and ACFOX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

ACFOX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to TWUIX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWUIX dropped -61.41% vs ACFOX's -58.92%.

TWUIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWUIX and ACFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer