PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWQZX vs. FGIPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund (TWQZX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWQZX achieves a 8.76% return, which is significantly lower than FGIPX's 17.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TWQZX has underperformed FGIPX with an annualized return of 11.43%, while FGIPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.11% annualized return.


TWQZX

1D
-0.21%
1M
1.52%
YTD
8.76%
6M
11.22%
1Y
29.66%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
12.33%
10Y*
11.43%

FGIPX

1D
-0.15%
1M
5.61%
YTD
17.87%
6M
22.35%
1Y
44.97%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
16.45%
10Y*
13.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWQZX
Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund
8.76%23.94%17.19%13.20%-7.13%31.23%1.29%18.09%-10.40%12.48%
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
17.87%30.18%15.44%12.17%3.28%21.73%-4.59%25.96%-9.95%18.52%

Correlation

The correlation between TWQZX and FGIPX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 2013

0.92

The correlation between TWQZX and FGIPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWQZX vs. FGIPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWQZX
TWQZX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TWQZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWQZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWQZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
TWQZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWQZX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

FGIPX
FGIPX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FGIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FGIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund (TWQZX) and Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWQZXFGIPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.71

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

6.20

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.40

23.75

-6.36

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWQZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is lower than the FGIPX Sharpe Ratio of 3.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWQZX and FGIPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWQZXFGIPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.64

3.95

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

1.11

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.77

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Drawdowns

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWQZX drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, which is greater than FGIPX's maximum drawdown of -37.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWQZX and FGIPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWQZXFGIPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-37.32%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-7.26%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.22%

-13.27%

-1.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.69%

-16.19%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.44%

-37.32%

-5.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.15%

-0.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.40%

-4.18%

-0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.89%

-0.20%

Volatility

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund (TWQZX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class (FGIPX) at 2.79%. This indicates that TWQZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGIPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWQZXFGIPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.14%

2.79%

+0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.61%

8.23%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.18%

11.40%

-0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

14.89%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.25%

17.12%

+1.13%

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWQZX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than FGIPX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWQZX vs. FGIPX - Dividend Comparison

TWQZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.66%, less than FGIPX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGIPX
Nomura Growth and Income Fund Institutional Class
10.02%11.68%12.69%7.50%7.35%12.20%2.13%52.72%25.63%5.58%4.22%5.88%
TWQZX
Transamerica Large Cap Value Fund
3.66%4.01%3.06%8.74%7.07%2.41%1.97%4.88%13.02%13.17%9.91%13.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWQZX and FGIPX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWQZX has higher volatility (3.14%) compared to FGIPX (2.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWQZX dropped -42.44% vs FGIPX's -37.32%.

FGIPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.95 vs 2.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWQZX and FGIPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer