PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWOX vs. CSHP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWOX vs. CSHP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWOX achieves a 2.49% return, which is significantly higher than CSHP's 1.83% return.


TWOX

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.63%
YTD
2.49%
6M
1.73%
1Y
15.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CSHP

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.27%
YTD
1.83%
6M
1.92%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWOX vs. CSHP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TWOX and CSHP is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2025

-0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWOX vs. CSHP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWOX
TWOX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
TWOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWOX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
TWOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWOX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

CSHP
CSHP Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
CSHP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSHP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSHP Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CSHP Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSHP Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWOX vs. CSHP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) and iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWOXCSHPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-25.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

6.46

-5.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

65.45

-63.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.57

381.67

-374.10

TWOX vs. CSHP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is lower than the CSHP Sharpe Ratio of 11.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWOX and CSHP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWOX vs. CSHP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWOX drawdown since its inception was -19.35%, which is greater than CSHP's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWOX and CSHP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWOXCSHPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.35%

-0.08%

-19.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-0.06%

-9.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.02%

-0.04%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.54%

-0.00%

-2.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.01%

+2.00%

Volatility

TWOX vs. CSHP - Volatility Comparison

iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF (TWOX) has a higher volatility of 0.62% compared to iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF (CSHP) at 0.16%. This indicates that TWOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSHP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWOXCSHPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.62%

0.16%

+0.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.95%

0.27%

+7.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

0.36%

+10.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.46%

0.41%

+16.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

0.41%

+16.05%

TWOX vs. CSHP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWOX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSHP's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWOX vs. CSHP - Dividend Comparison

TWOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than CSHP's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
CSHP
iShares Enhanced Short-Term Bond Active ETF
3.91%5.39%1.96%
TWOX
iShares Large Cap Accelerated Outcome ETF
0.55%0.57%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWOX and CSHP have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TWOX has higher volatility (0.62%) compared to CSHP (0.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWOX dropped -19.35% vs CSHP's -0.08%.

On 1-year performance, TWOX leads with 15.18% vs 3.94% for CSHP. On fees, CSHP is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, CSHP has been the lower-risk option at 0.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TWOX has performed better with a 15.18% return vs 3.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CSHP is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for TWOX.

CSHP has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.55% for TWOX.

TWOX is categorized as Defined Outcome, while CSHP is Ultrashort Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TWOX and 0.20% for CSHP.

CSHP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.09 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWOX and CSHP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer