PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWN vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWN vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWN achieves a 90.00% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return. Over the past 10 years, TWN has underperformed MU with an annualized return of 30.17%, while MU has yielded a comparatively higher 56.13% annualized return.


TWN

1D
-0.11%
1M
8.54%
YTD
90.00%
6M
99.81%
1Y
195.95%
3Y*
66.17%
5Y*
35.51%
10Y*
30.17%

MU

1D
1.45%
1M
87.28%
YTD
278.41%
6M
361.42%
1Y
958.34%
3Y*
150.98%
5Y*
67.58%
10Y*
56.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWN vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
90.00%54.11%32.76%51.73%-38.54%58.14%40.71%47.00%-19.15%33.80%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
278.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%87.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TWN and MU is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 3, 1989

0.26

The correlation between TWN and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWN vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWN
TWN Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
TWN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWN Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
TWN Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWN Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWN vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TWNMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

7.36

14.69

-7.33

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

7.40

7.32

+0.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.02

1.94

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

21.97

31.98

-10.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

72.01

126.47

-54.46

TWN vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWN Sharpe Ratio is 7.36, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 14.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWN and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TWNMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.36

14.69

-7.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.50

1.30

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.34

1.13

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.31

-0.07

Drawdowns

TWN vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWN drawdown since its inception was -79.52%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWN and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWNMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.52%

-98.25%

+18.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.09%

-30.28%

+21.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.97%

-57.63%

+27.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.72%

-57.63%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.72%

-57.63%

+5.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

0.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.41%

-58.20%

+20.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.77%

7.64%

-4.87%

Volatility

TWN vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Taiwan Fund Inc. (TWN) is 11.85%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that TWN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWNMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

28.51%

-16.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.86%

53.48%

-30.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.81%

66.00%

-39.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.87%

52.31%

-28.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.52%

49.66%

-27.14%

Dividends

TWN vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

TWN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.11%, more than MU's 0.05% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TWN
The Taiwan Fund Inc.
6.11%11.62%19.14%1.26%0.00%7.78%12.91%8.26%11.27%3.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWN and MU have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to TWN (11.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWN dropped -79.52% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs 7.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWN and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer