TWM vs. TSMX
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and TSMX (Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TWM is passively managed, while TSMX is actively managed. Over the past year, TWM returned -50.37% vs 240.03% for TSMX. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSMX.
Performance
TWM vs. TSMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly lower than TSMX's 80.35% return.
TWM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -50.37%
- 3Y*
- -30.94%
- 5Y*
- -17.34%
- 10Y*
- -28.49%
TSMX
- 1D
- -13.50%
- 1M
- 12.92%
- YTD
- 80.35%
- 6M
- 88.28%
- 1Y
- 240.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TWM vs. TSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -32.09% | -24.71% | -3.95% |
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 80.35% | 81.48% | 16.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and TSMX is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2024 | -0.51 |
The correlation between TWM and TSMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.52 to -0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
TWM vs. TSMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TWM
TSMX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TWM
TSMX
-
Basic Materials
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Communication Services
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Consumer Defensive
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Energy
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Healthcare
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Industrials
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Real Estate
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Technology
TWM
-
TSMX
Utilities
TWM
-
TSMX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. TSMX — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
TSMX
TWM vs. TSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.39 | -0.61 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 6.92 | -7.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 22.13 | -23.77 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. TSMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than TSMX's maximum drawdown of -63.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and TSMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -63.80% | -36.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.15% | -34.93% | -16.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -13.50% | -86.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -15.59% | -71.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.89% | 10.90% | +19.99% |
Volatility
TWM vs. TSMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 13.21%, while Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares (TSMX) has a volatility of 33.01%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | TSMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 33.01% | -19.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 60.15% | -31.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.41% | 76.69% | -37.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 82.69% | -37.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.84% | 82.69% | -36.85% |
TWM vs. TSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSMX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. TSMX - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than TSMX's 4.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TSMX Direxion Daily TSM Bull 2X Shares | 4.58% | 8.01% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 6.67% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and TSMX have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSMX has higher volatility (33.01%) compared to TWM (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs TSMX's -63.80%.
On 1-year performance, TSMX leads with 240.03% vs -50.37% for TWM. On fees, TWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSMX has performed better with a 240.03% return vs -50.37%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSMX.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 4.58% for TSMX.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 1.05% for TSMX.
TSMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWM and TSMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer