TWM vs. SOXL
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-200%) while SOXL tracks the ICE Semiconductor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TWM returned -28.49%/yr vs 64.56%/yr for SOXL. At a correlation of -0.70, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
TWM vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 450.61% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed SOXL with an annualized return of -28.49%, while SOXL has yielded a comparatively higher 64.56% annualized return.
TWM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -50.37%
- 3Y*
- -30.94%
- 5Y*
- -17.34%
- 10Y*
- -28.49%
SOXL
- 1D
- -23.06%
- 1M
- 21.44%
- YTD
- 450.61%
- 6M
- 429.57%
- 1Y
- 976.09%
- 3Y*
- 120.84%
- 5Y*
- 42.16%
- 10Y*
- 64.56%
TWM vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -32.09% | -24.71% | -19.35% | -26.84% | 28.43% | -35.43% | -60.01% | -38.40% | 19.15% | -26.36% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 450.61% | 54.91% | -12.31% | 226.98% | -85.66% | 118.84% | 70.04% | 231.83% | -39.07% | 141.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and SOXL is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.69 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2010 | -0.71 |
The correlation between TWM and SOXL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.70 to -0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
TWM vs. SOXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TWM
SOXL
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TWM
SOXL
-
Basic Materials
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Communication Services
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Cyclical
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Consumer Defensive
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Energy
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Healthcare
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Industrials
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Real Estate
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Technology
TWM
-
SOXL
Utilities
TWM
-
SOXL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
SOXL
TWM vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -9.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.58 | -0.80 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 22.69 | -23.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 72.83 | -74.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than SOXL's maximum drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -90.46% | -9.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.15% | -43.47% | -7.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.07% | -87.88% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.44% | -90.46% | +14.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | -90.46% | -6.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -23.06% | -76.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -34.95% | -52.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.89% | 13.52% | +17.37% |
Volatility
TWM vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 13.21%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL) has a volatility of 68.39%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 68.39% | -55.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 99.84% | -71.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.41% | 116.79% | -77.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 110.35% | -65.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.84% | 100.62% | -54.78% |
TWM vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than SOXL's 0.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.03% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 6.67% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and SOXL have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXL has higher volatility (68.39%) compared to TWM (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs SOXL's -90.46%.
On 10-year performance, SOXL leads with 64.56% vs -28.49% for TWM. On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOXL has performed better with a 64.56% return vs -28.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TWM.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.03% for SOXL.
TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while SOXL tracks ICE Semiconductor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 0.75% for SOXL.
SOXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.45 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWM and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer