TWM vs. NTSD
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. TWM is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.85, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.
Performance
TWM vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TWM
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -33.44%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -50.14%
- 3Y*
- -31.40%
- 5Y*
- -17.67%
- 10Y*
- -28.63%
NTSD
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TWM vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -33.04% |
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 15.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and NTSD is -0.85, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2026 | -0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. NTSD — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
NTSD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TWM vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. NTSD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, which is greater than NTSD's maximum drawdown of -5.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and NTSD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -5.58% | -94.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -3.31% | -96.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -1.12% | -86.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.83% | — | — |
Volatility
TWM vs. NTSD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | NTSD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.25% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.39% | 24.95% | +14.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 24.95% | +20.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.83% | 24.95% | +20.88% |
TWM vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, while NTSD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 6.81% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and NTSD have a correlation of -0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TWM.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 0.00% for NTSD.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 0.35% for NTSD.
Find the right allocation for TWM and NTSD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer