TWM vs. KORU
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and KORU (Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-200%) while KORU tracks the MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TWM returned -28.49%/yr vs 14.49%/yr for KORU. At a correlation of -0.52, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for KORU.
Performance
TWM vs. KORU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -32.09% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 285.56% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed KORU with an annualized return of -28.49%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively higher 14.49% annualized return.
TWM
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -32.09%
- 6M
- -28.69%
- 1Y
- -50.37%
- 3Y*
- -30.94%
- 5Y*
- -17.34%
- 10Y*
- -28.49%
KORU
- 1D
- -35.70%
- 1M
- -10.30%
- YTD
- 285.56%
- 6M
- 341.44%
- 1Y
- 858.44%
- 3Y*
- 100.70%
- 5Y*
- 11.21%
- 10Y*
- 14.49%
TWM vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -32.09% | -24.71% | -19.35% | -26.84% | 28.43% | -35.43% | -60.01% | -38.40% | 19.15% | -26.36% |
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 285.56% | 432.73% | -62.18% | 28.61% | -70.16% | -33.86% | 48.78% | 5.47% | -59.89% | 167.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and KORU is -0.54, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.55 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 10, 2013 | -0.52 |
The correlation between TWM and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.55 to -0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.
TWM vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TWM
KORU
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
TWM
KORU
Basic Materials
TWM
-
KORU
Communication Services
TWM
-
KORU
Consumer Cyclical
TWM
-
KORU
Consumer Defensive
TWM
-
KORU
Energy
TWM
-
KORU
Healthcare
TWM
-
KORU
Industrials
TWM
-
KORU
Real Estate
TWM
-
KORU
-
Technology
TWM
-
KORU
Utilities
TWM
-
KORU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
KORU
TWM vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -7.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.53 | -0.75 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | 14.12 | -15.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.64 | 41.38 | -43.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and KORU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -95.79% | -4.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.15% | -61.39% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.07% | -73.34% | -0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.44% | -93.34% | +16.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | -95.79% | -1.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -44.66% | -55.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -57.41% | -29.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.89% | 20.91% | +9.98% |
Volatility
TWM vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 13.21%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 92.27%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | KORU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.21% | 92.27% | -79.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.79% | 138.63% | -109.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.41% | 144.16% | -104.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.25% | 91.40% | -46.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.84% | 83.03% | -37.19% |
TWM vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.67%, more than KORU's 0.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KORU Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares | 0.24% | 0.89% | 4.10% | 2.55% | 0.48% | 0.76% | 0.01% | 0.93% | 1.40% | 3.59% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 6.67% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and KORU have a correlation of -0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KORU has higher volatility (92.27%) compared to TWM (13.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs KORU's -95.79%.
On 10-year performance, KORU leads with 14.49% vs -28.49% for TWM. On fees, TWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, KORU has performed better with a 14.49% return vs -28.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.67%, compared with 0.24% for KORU.
TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 1.29% for KORU.
KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.02 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWM and KORU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer