TWM vs. IFED
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED).
TWM and IFED are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TWM is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 2000 (-200%). It was launched on Jan 23, 2007. IFED is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the IFED Large-Cap US Equity Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Sep 14, 2021. Both TWM and IFED are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TWM vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TWM vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -3.96% | -24.71% | -19.35% | -26.84% | 28.43% | -5.82% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -10.58% | 15.02% | 23.04% | 20.78% | -1.46% | 8.46% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -3.96% return, which is significantly higher than IFED's -10.58% return.
TWM
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- 10.23%
- YTD
- -3.96%
- 6M
- -7.79%
- 1Y
- -40.81%
- 3Y*
- -23.11%
- 5Y*
- -13.20%
- 10Y*
- -26.31%
IFED
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -5.40%
- YTD
- -10.58%
- 6M
- -10.82%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 14.88%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TWM vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
IFED
TWM vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | 0.28 | -1.16 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | 0.51 | -1.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | 1.07 | -0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.38 | -1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.89 | 1.18 | -2.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.88 | 0.28 | -1.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.55 | 0.58 | -1.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and IFED is -0.80. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
TWM vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, while IFED has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 4.72% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TWM vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.92%, which is greater than IFED's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and IFED.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.92% | -22.36% | -77.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -59.88% | -14.65% | -45.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.51% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.07% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.91% | -12.41% | -87.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.16% | -5.71% | -81.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.02% | 4.70% | +41.32% |
Volatility
TWM vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) has a higher volatility of 14.86% compared to ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED) at 4.93%. This indicates that TWM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IFED based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.86% | 4.93% | +9.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.99% | 10.82% | +18.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.52% | 18.80% | +27.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.13% | 19.71% | +25.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.69% | 19.71% | +25.98% |