PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TWM vs. ERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TWM vs. ERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -33.44% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 39.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -28.63%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -10.44% annualized return.


TWM

1D
-1.99%
1M
-9.52%
YTD
-33.44%
6M
-29.75%
1Y
-50.14%
3Y*
-31.40%
5Y*
-17.67%
10Y*
-28.63%

ERX

1D
-3.19%
1M
-18.65%
YTD
39.90%
6M
41.93%
1Y
53.28%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
24.28%
10Y*
-10.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TWM vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
-33.44%-24.71%-19.35%-26.84%28.43%-35.43%-60.01%-38.40%19.15%-26.36%
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
39.90%2.79%1.09%-12.26%130.58%111.91%-91.60%17.13%-55.94%-11.60%

Correlation

The correlation between TWM and ERX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008

-0.61

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TWM and ERX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.61 to -0.05, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.

TWM vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TWM
ERX

Financial Services

100.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

100.0%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

TWM
100.3%
ERX

-

Basic Materials

TWM

-

ERX

-

Communication Services

TWM

-

ERX

-

Consumer Cyclical

TWM

-

ERX

-

Consumer Defensive

TWM

-

ERX

-

Energy

TWM

-

ERX
100.0%

Healthcare

TWM

-

ERX

-

Industrials

TWM

-

ERX

-

Real Estate

TWM

-

ERX

-

Technology

TWM

-

ERX

-

Utilities

TWM

-

ERX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TWM vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TWM
TWM Risk / Return Rank: 00
Overall Rank
TWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
TWM Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
TWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
TWM Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ERX
ERX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ERX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
ERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ERX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TWM vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TWMERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.78

1.21

-0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.88

-2.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.63

5.39

-7.01

TWM vs. ERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TWM Sharpe Ratio is -1.28, which is lower than the ERX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TWM and ERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TWM vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and ERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TWMERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.94%

-99.54%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.17%

-28.49%

-22.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.08%

-42.34%

-31.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.45%

-46.90%

-29.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.79%

-98.59%

+1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.94%

-92.94%

-7.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.29%

-67.10%

-20.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.83%

9.92%

+20.91%

Volatility

TWM vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 13.25%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TWMERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.25%

14.55%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.81%

34.19%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

39.39%

41.83%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

45.24%

51.93%

-6.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.83%

69.08%

-23.25%

TWM vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

TWM vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison

TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than ERX's 1.82% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
ERX
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares
1.82%2.54%2.94%3.17%2.23%2.16%2.35%1.56%3.10%0.85%
TWM
ProShares UltraShort Russell2000
6.81%5.36%6.21%4.72%0.17%0.00%0.41%1.49%0.73%0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TWM and ERX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ERX has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to TWM (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs ERX's -99.54%.

On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -10.44% vs -28.63% for TWM. On fees, TWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -10.44% return vs -28.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.

TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 1.82% for ERX.

TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 1.09% for ERX.

ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TWM and ERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer