TWM vs. ERX
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-200%) while ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TWM returned -27.39%/yr vs -10.35%/yr for ERX. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
TWM vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -32.00% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 57.54% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -27.39%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -10.35% annualized return.
TWM
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -21.02%
- YTD
- -32.00%
- 1Y
- -45.85%
- 3Y*
- -27.64%
- 5Y*
- -19.69%
- 10Y*
- -27.39%
ERX
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- 6.94%
- 6M
- 39.75%
- YTD
- 57.54%
- 1Y
- 68.66%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 34.10%
- 10Y*
- -10.35%
TWM vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -32.00% | -24.71% | -19.35% | -26.84% | 28.43% | -35.43% | -60.01% | -38.40% | 19.15% | -26.36% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 57.54% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 111.91% | -91.60% | 17.13% | -55.94% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and ERX is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | -0.61 |
The correlation between TWM and ERX shifts across timeframes, from -0.61 (all time) to 0.01 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
TWM vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TWM
ERX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TWM
ERX
-
Basic Materials
TWM
-
ERX
-
Communication Services
TWM
-
ERX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TWM
-
ERX
-
Consumer Defensive
TWM
-
ERX
-
Energy
TWM
-
ERX
Healthcare
TWM
-
ERX
-
Industrials
TWM
-
ERX
-
Real Estate
TWM
-
ERX
-
Technology
TWM
-
ERX
-
Utilities
TWM
-
ERX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
ERX
TWM vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.26 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 2.30 | -3.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.45 | 5.95 | -7.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -99.54% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.65% | -29.97% | -20.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.44% | -42.34% | -32.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.78% | -46.90% | -29.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.29% | -98.59% | +2.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.93% | -92.05% | -7.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.33% | -67.18% | -20.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 31.65% | 11.57% | +20.08% |
Volatility
TWM vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 7.55%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 12.31%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.55% | 12.31% | -4.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.50% | 33.63% | -5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.74% | 42.09% | -3.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.13% | 51.72% | -6.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.70% | 68.92% | -23.22% |
TWM vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.49%, more than ERX's 1.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.62% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 5.49% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and ERX have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERX has higher volatility (12.31%) compared to TWM (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -10.35% vs -27.39% for TWM. On fees, TWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 7.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -10.35% return vs -27.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 5.49%, compared with 1.62% for ERX.
TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 1.09% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs -1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWM and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer