TWM vs. ERX
TWM (ProShares UltraShort Russell2000) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - TWM tracks the Russell 2000 (-200%) while ERX tracks the Energy Select Sector Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TWM returned -28.63%/yr vs -10.44%/yr for ERX. At a correlation of -0.61, they often move in opposite directions. TWM charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for ERX.
Performance
TWM vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TWM achieves a -33.44% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 39.90% return. Over the past 10 years, TWM has underperformed ERX with an annualized return of -28.63%, while ERX has yielded a comparatively higher -10.44% annualized return.
TWM
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- -33.44%
- 6M
- -29.75%
- 1Y
- -50.14%
- 3Y*
- -31.40%
- 5Y*
- -17.67%
- 10Y*
- -28.63%
ERX
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -18.65%
- YTD
- 39.90%
- 6M
- 41.93%
- 1Y
- 53.28%
- 3Y*
- 18.69%
- 5Y*
- 24.28%
- 10Y*
- -10.44%
TWM vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | -33.44% | -24.71% | -19.35% | -26.84% | 28.43% | -35.43% | -60.01% | -38.40% | 19.15% | -26.36% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 39.90% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -12.26% | 130.58% | 111.91% | -91.60% | 17.13% | -55.94% | -11.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TWM and ERX is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | -0.61 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between TWM and ERX has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.61 to -0.05, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
TWM vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TWM
ERX
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TWM
ERX
-
Basic Materials
TWM
-
ERX
-
Communication Services
TWM
-
ERX
-
Consumer Cyclical
TWM
-
ERX
-
Consumer Defensive
TWM
-
ERX
-
Energy
TWM
-
ERX
Healthcare
TWM
-
ERX
-
Industrials
TWM
-
ERX
-
Real Estate
TWM
-
ERX
-
Technology
TWM
-
ERX
-
Utilities
TWM
-
ERX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TWM vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
TWM
ERX
TWM vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.78 | 1.21 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 1.88 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.63 | 5.39 | -7.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TWM vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TWM drawdown since its inception was -99.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TWM and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.94% | -99.54% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.17% | -28.49% | -22.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.08% | -42.34% | -31.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | -46.90% | -29.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.79% | -98.59% | +1.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.94% | -92.94% | -7.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.29% | -67.10% | -20.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.83% | 9.92% | +20.91% |
Volatility
TWM vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 (TWM) is 13.25%, while Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) has a volatility of 14.55%. This indicates that TWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TWM | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.25% | 14.55% | -1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.81% | 34.19% | -5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 39.39% | 41.83% | -2.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.24% | 51.93% | -6.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 45.83% | 69.08% | -23.25% |
TWM vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TWM has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ERX's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TWM vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
TWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.81%, more than ERX's 1.82% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.82% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
TWM ProShares UltraShort Russell2000 | 6.81% | 5.36% | 6.21% | 4.72% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.41% | 1.49% | 0.73% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TWM and ERX have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ERX has higher volatility (14.55%) compared to TWM (13.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TWM dropped -99.94% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 10-year performance, ERX leads with -10.44% vs -28.63% for TWM. On fees, TWM is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TWM has been the lower-risk option at 13.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ERX has performed better with a -10.44% return vs -28.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TWM is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for ERX.
TWM has the higher dividend yield at 6.81%, compared with 1.82% for ERX.
TWM tracks Russell 2000 (-200%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TWM and 1.09% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs -1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TWM and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer