TUSK vs. GENL.L
TUSK (Mammoth Energy Services, Inc.) and GENL.L (Genel Energy plc) are both stocks. TUSK operates in Conglomerates (Industrials), while GENL.L operates in Oil & Gas E&P (Energy). Over the past 5 years, TUSK returned -3.15%/yr vs -17.46%/yr for GENL.L. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TUSK is traded in USD, while GENL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GENL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSK achieves a 77.84% return, which is significantly higher than GENL.L's -9.99% return.
TUSK
- 1D
- 3.13%
- 1M
- 2.81%
- YTD
- 77.84%
- 6M
- 85.88%
- 1Y
- 21.85%
- 3Y*
- -10.70%
- 5Y*
- -3.15%
- 10Y*
- —
GENL.L
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.09%
- YTD
- -9.99%
- 6M
- -6.23%
- 1Y
- -1.22%
- 3Y*
- -20.70%
- 5Y*
- -17.46%
- 10Y*
- -6.06%
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 77.84% | -38.33% | -32.74% | -48.44% | 375.27% | -59.10% | 102.27% | -87.59% | -7.67% | 29.14% |
GENL.L Genel Energy plc | -9.99% | -3.05% | -15.38% | -31.01% | -8.36% | -5.79% | -15.19% | 16.22% | 55.32% | 43.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSK and GENL.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2016 | 0.13 |
The correlation between TUSK and GENL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TUSK:
$159.01M
GENL.L:
£148.51M
TUSK:
-$1.47
GENL.L:
-$0.31
TUSK:
2.54
GENL.L:
1.38
TUSK:
0.60
GENL.L:
0.57
TUSK:
$62.70M
GENL.L:
$143.56M
TUSK:
$9.65M
GENL.L:
$1.98M
TUSK:
-$14.10M
GENL.L:
$21.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSK vs. GENL.L — Risk / Return Rank
TUSK
GENL.L
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) and Genel Energy plc (GENL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TUSK | GENL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.05 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.02 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.74 | 0.04 | +0.70 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSK drawdown since its inception was -98.55%, roughly equal to the maximum GENL.L drawdown of -96.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSK and GENL.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSK | GENL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.55% | -96.39% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.52% | -34.80% | -7.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -69.27% | -54.31% | -14.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -80.00% | -71.01% | -8.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -83.09% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -91.77% | -94.68% | +2.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.03% | -71.76% | -1.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.68% | 21.97% | +1.71% |
Volatility
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Volatility Comparison
Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. (TUSK) has a higher volatility of 22.47% compared to Genel Energy plc (GENL.L) at 11.46%. This indicates that TUSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GENL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSK | GENL.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.47% | 11.46% | +11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.18% | 27.68% | +27.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.95% | 50.88% | +16.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 72.68% | 49.02% | +23.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 87.23% | 56.81% | +30.42% |
Dividends
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither TUSK nor GENL.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GENL.L Genel Energy plc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.12% | 9.35% | 6.42% | 6.55% | 4.77% | 0.00% |
TUSK Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.36% | 1.39% |
Financials
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. and Genel Energy plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TUSK vs. GENL.L - Profitability Comparison
TUSK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 15.78M and revenue of 22.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.6%.
GENL.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported a gross profit of -3.72M and revenue of 33.06M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -11.3%.
TUSK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.68M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.3%.
GENL.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported an operating income of -12.36M and revenue of 33.06M, resulting in an operating margin of -37.4%.
TUSK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mammoth Energy Services, Inc. reported a net income of 5.19M and revenue of 22.03M, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.
GENL.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Genel Energy plc reported a net income of -9.55M and revenue of 33.06M, resulting in a net margin of -28.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSK and GENL.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for TUSK and GENL.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer