TUSI vs. ZTWO
TUSI (Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF) and ZTWO (F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TUSI is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Touchstone, while ZTWO is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the ICE 2-Year US Target Maturity Corporate Index - Benchmark TR Gross. TUSI is actively managed, while ZTWO is passively managed. Over the past year, TUSI returned 4.73% vs 4.04% for ZTWO. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TUSI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for ZTWO.
Performance
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TUSI achieves a 1.64% return, which is significantly higher than ZTWO's 0.89% return.
TUSI
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.64%
- 6M
- 2.01%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZTWO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 0.89%
- 6M
- 1.28%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
TUSI Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF | 1.64% | 5.09% | 0.16% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 0.89% | 5.49% | 0.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TUSI and ZTWO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TUSI vs. ZTWO — Risk / Return Rank
TUSI
ZTWO
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF (TUSI) and F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TUSI | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.59 | 3.11 | +1.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.87 | 4.99 | +2.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.17 | 1.65 | +0.53 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 19.72 | 4.30 | +15.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 84.17 | 20.38 | +63.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TUSI | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59 | 3.11 | +1.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 5.62 | 3.16 | +2.46 |
Drawdowns
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TUSI drawdown since its inception was -0.40%, smaller than the maximum ZTWO drawdown of -0.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TUSI and ZTWO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TUSI | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.40% | -0.93% | +0.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.24% | -0.93% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.02% | -0.11% | +0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.04% | -0.10% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.20% | -0.14% |
Volatility
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF (TUSI) is 0.39%, while F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTWO) has a volatility of 0.43%. This indicates that TUSI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZTWO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TUSI | ZTWO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.39% | 0.43% | -0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.66% | 0.97% | -0.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.04% | 1.31% | -0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 1.49% | -0.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.96% | 1.49% | -0.53% |
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TUSI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ZTWO's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TUSI vs. ZTWO - Dividend Comparison
TUSI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, more than ZTWO's 4.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TUSI Touchstone Ultra Short Income ETF | 4.57% | 4.85% | 5.50% | 5.41% | 1.38% |
ZTWO F/M 2-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.12% | 4.31% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TUSI and ZTWO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ZTWO has higher volatility (0.43%) compared to TUSI (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TUSI dropped -0.40% vs ZTWO's -0.93%.
On 1-year performance, TUSI leads with 4.73% vs 4.04% for ZTWO. On fees, ZTWO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TUSI has performed better with a 4.73% return vs 4.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZTWO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TUSI.
TUSI has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 4.12% for ZTWO.
TUSI is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while ZTWO is Short-Term Bond. They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TUSI and 0.15% for ZTWO.
TUSI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.59 vs 3.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TUSI and ZTWO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer